Cost-effectiveness analysis of coronary arteries bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through drug stent in iran: a comparative study
- PMID: 36793078
- PMCID: PMC9930214
- DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00426-y
Cost-effectiveness analysis of coronary arteries bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through drug stent in iran: a comparative study
Abstract
Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis plays a key role in evaluating health systems and services. Coronary artery disease is one of the primary health concerns worldwide. This study sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of Coronary Arteries Bypass Grafting (CABG) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) through drug stent using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) index.
Methods: This is a cohort study involving all patients undergoing CABG and PCI through drug stent in south of Iran. A total of 410 patients were randomly selected to be included in the study. Data were gathered using SF-36, SAQ and a form for cost data from the patients' perspective. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. Considering the analysis of cost-effectiveness, Markov Model was initially developed using TreeAge Pro 2020. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results: Compared with the group treated with PCI, the total cost of interventions was higher in the CABG group ($102,103.8 vs $71,401.22) and the cost of lost productivity ($20,228.68 vs $7632.11), while the cost of hospitalization was lower in CABG ($67,567.1 vs $49,660.97). The cost of hotel stay and travel ($6967.82 vs $2520.12) and the cost of medication ($7340.18 vs $11,588.01) was lower in CABG. From the patients' perspective and SAQ instrument, CABG was cost-saving, with a reduction of $16,581 for every increase in effectiveness. Based on patients' perspective and SF-36 instrument, CABG was cost-saving, with a reduction of $34,543 for every increase in effectiveness.
Conclusion: In the same indications, CABG intervention leads to more resource savings.
Keywords: Costs-effectiveness; Markov model; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Seattle angina questionnaire; Short form-36 questionnaire.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
There is no competing interest related to this study.
Figures
References
-
- Ahmadi AM, Imami Razavi SA, Yaqubi Kalateh Rahman M. Comparison of cost-benefit of transplantation of hemograft heart valves and mechanical heart valves using caliber index in Imam Khomeini Hospital from 2001 to 2006 [M.Sc.]. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2007. [In Persian]
-
- Fayyazi P, Sayadi N, Gheibizadeh M. Comparison of quality of life, before and after open heart surgery. Zahedan Med Sci Res. 2011;13(7):1–4.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
