Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;11(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00655-6.

The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound

Affiliations

The time cost of physiologically ineffective intravenous fluids in the emergency department: an observational pilot study employing wearable Doppler ultrasound

Jon-Émile S Kenny et al. J Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: Little data exist on the time spent by emergency department (ED) personnel providing intravenous (IV) fluid to 'responsive' versus 'unresponsive' patients.

Methods: A prospective, convenience sample of adult ED patients was studied; patients were enrolled if preload expansion was indicated for any reason. Using a novel, wireless, wearable ultrasound, carotid artery Doppler was obtained before and throughout a preload challenge (PC) prior to each bag of ordered IV fluid. The treating clinician was blinded to the results of the ultrasound. IV fluid was deemed 'effective' or 'ineffective' based on the greatest change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT) during the PC. The duration, in minutes, of each bag of IV fluid administered was recorded.

Results: 53 patients were recruited and 2 excluded for Doppler artifact. There were 86 total PCs included in the investigation comprising 81.7 L of administered IV fluid. 19,667 carotid Doppler cardiac cycles were analyzed. Using ccFT ≥ + 7 ms to discriminate 'physiologically effective' from 'ineffective' IV fluid, we observed that 54 PCs (63%) were 'effective', comprising 51.7 L of IV fluid, whereas, 32 (37%) were 'ineffective' comprising 30 L of IV fluid. 29.75 total hours across all 51 patients were spent in the ED providing IV fluids categorized as 'ineffective.'

Conclusions: We report the largest-known carotid artery Doppler analysis (i.e., roughly 20,000 cardiac cycles) in ED patients requiring IV fluid expansion. A clinically significant amount of time was spent providing physiologically ineffective IV fluid. This may represent an avenue to improve ED care efficiency.

Keywords: Carotid artery; Doppler ultrasound; Fluid refractory; Fluid responsiveness; Personalized medicine; Quality improvement; Wearable technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JESK, SOG, DJ, ZY, LMH, ME, JKE work for Flosonics Medical, the start-up building the wearable Doppler ultrasound. AJ, AJB, VCL, BOK declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The wearable Doppler ultrasound and its interface. A The device on a healthy volunteer. B Carotid Doppler spectra showing calculation of carotid corrected flow time (ccFT) by the equation of Wodey. Velocity is on y-axis in centimeters per second (cm/s) and time on x-axis in seconds (s); heart rate (HR) is calculated from cycle length. C Example of a preload challenge shown on the graphical user interface of the wearable Doppler. Each green bar represents the ccFT of a single cardiac cycle; the y-axis is ccFT in milliseconds and the x-axis is time in seconds
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of effective and ineffective preload challenges based on ccFT thresholds determined by Barjaktarevic and colleagues

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Michard F, Teboul J-L. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2000;4(5):282. doi: 10.1186/cc710. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michard F, Teboul J-L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121(6):2000–2008. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Shi R, Teboul J-L. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenny J-ES, Barjaktarevic I. Letter to the Editor: Stroke volume is the key measure of fluid responsiveness. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03498-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finfer S, Myburgh J, Bellomo R. Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(9):541–557. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0044-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources