Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;40(1):14-21.
doi: 10.1177/14550725221092862. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps

Nady El-Guebaly  1 , John Foster  2 , Anees Bahji  1 , Matilda Hellman  3
Affiliations

The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps

Nady El-Guebaly et al. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

The critical role of peer reviewers in the publishing process is examined. Examples of typical challenges are provided, including the relative lack of rewards for this important task. Particular attention is paid to the need to consider the diversity of the peer reviewers recruited and impediments to the selection beyond Areas of Competence, often due to the small available pool. Finally, recommendations for improvement are suggested.

Keywords: competence areas; diversity; peer review; publication; recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balster R. L. (2017). Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals. In Babor T. F., Stenius K., Pates R., Miovský M., O’Reilly J., Candon P. (Eds.), Publishing addiction science: A guide for the perplexed (pp. 245–263). Ubiquity Press. 10.5334/bbd.m. License: CC-BY 4.0 - DOI
    1. Bianchi F., Grimaldo F.,, Squazzoni F. (2019). The F3-index: Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 78–86. 10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.007 - DOI
    1. Black N., van Rooyen S., Godlee F., Smith R.,, Evans S. (1998). What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA, 280(3), 231–233. 10.1001/jama.280.3.231 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crosetto P. (2021) Is MDPI a predatory publisher? Paolo Crosetto . https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publi...
    1. Cuellar N. G. (2018). Recognition for reviewers: PUBLONS! Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 29(3), 221–221. 10.1177/1043659618764157 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources