Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 30:9:1043508.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1043508. eCollection 2022.

Patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: Influencing factors

Zhuce Shao  1 , Shuxiong Bi  1
Affiliations
Review

Patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: Influencing factors

Zhuce Shao et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

It is reported that the dissatisfaction rate after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is between 7% and 20%. Patient satisfaction has already become a public health problem that puzzles the world, and it is a problem to be solved that cannot be ignored in the development of global public health. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature to answer the following questions: what are the main factors leading to high patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction after THA? The literature on patient satisfaction after THA was reviewed. As far as we know, there is no such detailed and timely overview of THA satisfaction as this article, and the purpose articles we use search engines to search are all RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial) type works, excluding cross-sectional studies and other experiments with low evidence level. Hence, the quality of this article is high. The search engines used are MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE. The keywords used are "THA" and "satisfaction." The main preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors that affect patient satisfaction are summarized in detail below.

Keywords: THA – total hip arthroplasty; influence factor; operation; review; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Picavet HS, Hazes JM. Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Ann Rheum Dis. (2003) 62(7):644–50. 10.1136/ard.62.7.644 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. (2003) 81(9):646–56. PMID: 14710506; PMCID: PMC2572542 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araújo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2011) 19(11):1270–85. 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higashi H, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model. PLoS One. (2011) 6(9):e25403. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty. (2011) 26(2):209–13. 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013 - DOI - PubMed