Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 30:13:1083297.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1083297. eCollection 2023.

Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology

Affiliations
Review

Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology

Filippo Merloni et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.

Keywords: breast cancer; locoregional treatment; primary tumor; radiotherapy; stage IV; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

UD received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees for Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Clovis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche. MP has received advisory board fees from Novartis. All other authors confirm that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aggressive approach combining modern systemic therapy, locoregional treatment of the primary tumor and metastases-directed therapy in stage IV de novo oligometastatic breast cancer patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Shaughnessy J. Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist (2005) 10(S3):20–9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-90003-20 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rashid OM, Nagahashi M, Ramachandran S, Graham L, Yamada A, Spiegel S, et al. . Resection of the primary tumor improves survival in metastatic breast cancer by reducing overall tumor burden. Surg (United States) (2013) 153(6):771–8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.02.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danna EA, Sinha P, Gilbert M, Clements VK, Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Surgical removal of primary tumor reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression despite the presence of metastatic disease. Cancer Res (2004) 64(6):2205–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2646 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu H, Patel MR, Prescher JA, Patsialou A, Qian D, Lin J, et al. . Cancer stem cells from human breast tumors are involved in spontaneous metastases in orthotopic mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2010) 107(42):18115–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006732107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norton L, Massagué J. Is cancer a disease of self-seeding? Nat Med (2006) 12(8):875–8. doi: 10.1038/nm0806-875 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources