Double blind randomized controlled trial for subjects undergoing surgery receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at tertiary hospital: the clinical pharmacist's interventions
- PMID: 36793909
- PMCID: PMC9891789
- DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2727
Double blind randomized controlled trial for subjects undergoing surgery receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis at tertiary hospital: the clinical pharmacist's interventions
Abstract
Background: A surgical site infection (SSI) has significant clinical, humanistic and economic consequences. Surgical antimicrobials prophylaxis (SAP) is a reliable standard to prevent SSIs.
Objective: The objective was to test that the clinical pharmacist's interventions may facilitate the implementation of SAP protocol and subsequent reduction of SSIs.
Methods: This was double blinded randomized controlled interventional hospital-based-study at Khartoum State-Sudan. A total of 226 subjects underwent general surgeries at four surgical units. Subjects were randomized to interventions and controls in a (1:1) ratio where patient, assessors and physician were blinded. The surgical team has received structured educational and behavioral SAP protocol mini courses by way of directed lecturers, workshops, seminars and awareness campaigns delivered by the clinical pharmacist. The clinical pharmacist provided SAP protocol to the interventions group. The outcome measure was the primary reduction in SSIs.
Results: There were (51.8%, 117/226) females, (61/113 interventions versus 56/113 controls), and (48.2%, 109/226) males (52 interventions and 57 controls). The overall rate of SSIs was assessed during 14 days post-operatively and was documented in (35.4%, 80/226). The difference in adherence to locally developed SAP protocol regarding the recommended antimicrobial was significant (P <0.001) between the interventions group (78, 69%) and the controls group (59, 52.2%). The clinical pharmacist's implementation of the SAP protocol revealed significant differences in SSIs with reduction in SSIs from 42.5% to 25.7% versus the controls group from 57.5% to 44.2% respectively, P = 0.001 between the interventions group and the controls group respectively.
Conclusion: The clinical pharmacist's interventions were very effective in sustainable adherence to SAP protocol and subsequent reduction in SSIs within the interventions group.
Keywords: adherence; clinical pharmacist; randomized clinical trial; surgical antimicrobials prophylaxis (SAP); surgical site infections (SSIs).
Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice.
Similar articles
-
Risk of surgical site infection, acute kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection following antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin plus a beta-lactam versus either drug alone: A national propensity-score-adjusted retrospective cohort study.PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 10;14(7):e1002340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340. eCollection 2017 Jul. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28692690 Free PMC article.
-
A clinical pharmacist-led integrated approach for evaluation of medication errors among medical intensive care unit patients.JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Mar;19(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000228. JBI Evid Implement. 2021. PMID: 33570331
-
Post-surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: Impact of pharmacist's educational intervention on appropriate use of antibiotics.J Infect Public Health. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):854-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 10. J Infect Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31196776
-
Effective Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery: The Relevance and Role of Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;12(12):1738. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121738. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136772 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of pharmacist care on diabetes outcomes in primary care settings: An umbrella review of published systematic reviews.Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Oct;14(5):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020. PMID: 31926868
Cited by
-
Effect of interventions on surgical site infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMC Surg. 2025 May 19;25(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02946-1. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40383759 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of clinical pharmacists' interventions in a rehabilitation setting.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Apr 25;18(1):2450593. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2450593. eCollection 2025. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025. PMID: 40297771 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions and impact of pharmacist-delivered services in perioperative setting on clinically important outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Jul 31;15:20420986241260169. doi: 10.1177/20420986241260169. eCollection 2024. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024. PMID: 39091467 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jun 19;29(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01938-w. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38890673 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an innovative clinical pharmacy service in a urology surgical unit: a new initiative from Qatar.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Sep 23;17(1):2401478. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2401478. eCollection 2024. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024. PMID: 39319114 Free PMC article.
References
-
- 1. Surgical site infections:prevention and treatment. NICE Guideline, No. 125. NICE Guideline Updates Team (UK). London:National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK);2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542473/. (Accessed 24th December 2019). - PubMed
- Surgical site infections:prevention and treatment. NICE Guideline, No 125. NICE Guideline Updates Team (UK) London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2019. [Accessed 24th December 2019]. https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542473/ - PubMed
-
- 2. Goede WJ, Lovely JK, Thompson RL, et al. Assessment of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Patients with Surgical Site Infections. Hosp Pharm. 2013;48(7):560-567. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4807-560 - PMC - PubMed
- Goede WJ, Lovely JK, Thompson RL, et al. Assessment of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Patients with Surgical Site Infections. Hosp Pharm. 2013;48(7):560–567. doi: 10.1310/hpj4807-560. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- 3. Singh R, Singla P, Chaudhary U. Surgical site infections:classification, risk factors, pathogenesis and preventive management:review article. Int J Pharma Research Health Sci. 2014;2(3):203-214.
- Singh R, Singla P, Chaudhary U. Surgical site infections:classification, risk factors, pathogenesis and preventive management:review article. Int J Pharma Research Health Sci. 2014;2(3):203–214.
-
- 4. Ameh EA1, Mshelbwala PM, Nasir AA, et al. Surgical site infection in children:prospective analysis of the burden and risk factors in a sub-Saharan African setting. Surg Infect. 2009;10(2):105-109. 10.1089/sur.2007.082 - PubMed
- Ameh EA1, Mshelbwala PM, Nasir AA, et al. Surgical site infection in children:prospective analysis of the burden and risk factors in a sub-Saharan African setting. Surg Infect. 2009;10(2):105–109. 10.1089/sur.2007.082. - PubMed
-
- 5. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event:Center for Disease Control. 2010.http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf?agree=yes&next=Ac.... Updated January 2015. Accessed May, 2018.
- Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event:Center for Disease Control. 2010. [Accessed May, 2018]. https: //www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf?agree=yes&next=Acce... .
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous