Candrive-Development of a Risk Stratification Tool for Older Drivers
- PMID: 36794785
- PMCID: PMC10692431
- DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad044
Candrive-Development of a Risk Stratification Tool for Older Drivers
Abstract
Background: Assessing an older adult's fitness-to-drive is an important part of clinical decision making. However, most existing risk prediction tools only have a dichotomous design, which does not account for subtle differences in risk status for patients with complex medical conditions or changes over time. Our objective was to develop an older driver risk stratification tool (RST) to screen for medical fitness-to-drive in older adults.
Methods: Participants were active drivers aged 70 and older from 7 sites across 4 Canadian provinces. They underwent in-person assessments every 4 months with an annual comprehensive assessment. Participant vehicles were instrumented to provide vehicle and passive Global Positioning System (GPS) data. The primary outcome measure was police-reported, expert-validated, at-fault collision adjusted per annual kilometers driven. Predictor variables included physical, cognitive, and health assessment measures.
Results: A total of 928 older drivers were recruited for this study beginning in 2009. The average age at enrollment was 76.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.8) with 62.1% male participants. The mean duration for participation was 4.9 (SD = 1.6) years. The derived Candrive RST included 4 predictors. Out of 4 483 person-years of driving, 74.8% fell within the lowest risk category. Only 2.9% of person-years were in the highest risk category where the relative risk for at-fault collisions was 5.26 (95% confidence interval = 2.81-9.84) compared to the lowest risk group.
Conclusions: For older drivers whose medical conditions create uncertainty regarding their fitness-to-drive, the Candrive RST may assist primary health care providers when initiating a conversation about driving and to guide further evaluation.
Keywords: Driving issues; Geriatric assessment; Primary care.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
M.B. was supported by a Canada Research Chair in Aging and Health during the development phase of this study. G.N. was supported by the George, Margaret and Gary Hunt Family Chair in Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, received a grant from the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging and served as Chair for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute on Aging Advisory Board. M.J.R. was supported by the Sunnybrook Psychiatry Partnership, received grants or contracts from the Canadian Institute of Health Research, Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration and Aging, and Centre for Brain Health Innovation, participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a study on multiple sclerosis and exercise, and served as Program Director for Geriatric Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. M.M.P. received grants or contracts from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, Aging Gracefully across Environments using Technology to Support Wellness, Engagement and Long Life Networks of Centres of Excellence Inc., Canadian Institutes of Health Research, New Horizons for Seniors Program, Winnipeg Foundation, Riverview Health Centre Foundation, Mitacs, University Research Grants Program and served as Chair of the Board for Transportation Options Network for Seniors in Manitoba. S.K. served as a Board Member of the Association of the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The other authors declare no conflict.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 May 5;80(6):glaf071. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf071. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40195578 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the validity of the AMA guide: A historical cohort analysis of the assessment of driving related skills and crash rate among older drivers.Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Mar 26. Accid Anal Prev. 2013. PMID: 23639888
-
Findings from the Candrive/Ozcandrive study: Low mileage older drivers, crash risk and reduced fitness to drive.Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 18. Accid Anal Prev. 2013. PMID: 23477415
-
Assessing and Counseling the Older Driver: A Concise Review for the Generalist Clinician.Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1582-1588. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.023. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 31378232 Review.
-
Medical review of fitness to drive in older drivers: the Maryland experience.Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Aug;9(4):342-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580801895301. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008. PMID: 18696391 Review.
Cited by
-
Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 May 5;80(6):glaf071. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf071. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40195578 Free PMC article.
-
Older Drivers Reduced Engagement in Distracting Behaviors Over a Six-Year Period: Findings From the Candrive Longitudinal Study.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;79(2):gbad168. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad168. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024. PMID: 37934029 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Charlton J, Koppel S, Odell M. Influence of chronic illness on crash involvement of motor vehicle drivers.2010;( 300). https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/216386/Influence-of-c....
-
- Vaa T. Impairments, diseases, age and their relative risks of accident involvement: results from meta-analysis. The Institute of Transport Economics; 2020;( 690). https://www.toi.no/getfile.php?mmfileid=5780. Accessed August 24, 2021.