Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;30(1):e100699.
doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699.

Health professionals' routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Health professionals' routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study

Addisalem Workie Demsash et al. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Documenting routine practice is significant for better diagnosis, treatment, continuity of care and medicolegal issues. However, health professionals' routine practice documentation is poorly practised. Therefore, this study aimed to assess health professionals' routine practice documentation and associated factors in a resource-limited setting.

Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was used from 24 March up to 19 April 2022. Stratified random sampling and a pretested self-administered questionnaire were used among 423 samples. Epi Info V.7.1 and STATA V.15 software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model were employed to describe the study subjects and to measure the strength of association between dependent and independent variables, respectively. A variable with a p value of <0.2 in bivariate logistic regression was considered for multivariable logistic regression. In multivariable logistic regression, ORs with 95% CIs and a p value of <0.05 were considered to determine the strength of association between dependent and independent variables.

Results: Health professionals' documentation practice was 51.1% (95% CI: 48.64 to 53.1). Lack of motivation (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.76), good knowledge (AOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.97), taking training (AOR: 4.18, 95% CI: 2.99 to 8.28), using electronic systems (AOR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.28), availability of standard documentation tools (AOR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.43) were statistically associated factors.

Conclusions: Health professionals' documentation practice is good. Lack of motivation, good knowledge, taking training, using electronic systems and the availability of documentation tools were significant factors. Stakeholders should provide additional training, and encourage professionals to use an electronic system for documentation practices.

Keywords: BMJ health informatics; data management; documentation; electronic health records; evidence-based nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sampling procedures of study participant selection. HC, health centres.

References

    1. Beach J, Oates J. Maintaining best practice in record-keeping and documentation. Nurs Stand 2014;28:45–50. 10.7748/ns2014.05.28.36.45.e8835 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seetharama S. Information generation and utilisation in hospitals: an analytical study. SRELS Journal of Information Management 1980;17:10–8.
    1. Kebede M, Endris Y, Zegeye DT. Nursing care documentation practice: the unfinished task of nursing care in the University of gondar Hospital. Inform Health Soc Care 2017;42:290–302. 10.1080/17538157.2016.1252766 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akhu-Zaheya L, Al-Maaitah R, Bany Hani S. Quality of nursing documentation: paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. J Clin Nurs 2018;27:e578–89. 10.1111/jocn.14097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bargaje C. Good documentation practice in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res 2011;2:59–63. 10.4103/2229-3485.80368 - DOI - PMC - PubMed