'Imposter participants' in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity?
- PMID: 36797816
- PMCID: PMC10154888
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13724
'Imposter participants' in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity?
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this letter work closely with Professor Carolyn Chew‐Graham, who is Editor in Chief of
Comment in
-
Fraudulent Online Survey Respondents May Disproportionately Threaten Validity of Research in Small Target Populations.Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14099. doi: 10.1111/hex.14099. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 38845165 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Gelinas L, Largent EA, Cohen IG, Kornetsky S, Bierer BE, Fernandez Lynch H. A framework for ethical payment to research participants. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:766‐771. - PubMed
-
- Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:160940691987459. 10.1177/1609406919874596 - DOI
-
- Kobakhidze MN, Hui J, Chui J, González A. Research disruptions, new opportunities: re‐imagining qualitative interview study during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20:160940692110515. 10.1177/16094069211051576 - DOI
-
- Flicker S. “Ask me no secrets, I'll tell you no lies”: what happens when a respondent's story makes no sense. Qual Rep. 2004;9(3):528‐537.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources