Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 14;15(1):e33778.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.33778. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors Restored Using Different Post and Crown Materials

Affiliations

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors Restored Using Different Post and Crown Materials

Nour Al-Deen Kharboutly et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background/purpose: Restoring endodontically treated teeth is a common problem in dental practice. Post and core restorations are one of the major options in the rehabilitation of these teeth. However, there is no final decision regarding the best material or technique to be used with these restorations. So, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different post and crown materials on the biomechanical behavior of restored maxillary central incisor using the finite element method.

Materials and methods: A total of 10 3D models of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with two prefabricated posts and three custom-made posts were modeled and grouped according to post material (gold, nickel-chrome, zirconia, and glass fiber) and crown material (lithium disilicate, and zirconia). Finite element analysis was conducted, and stress distribution was evaluated using von Mises criteria.

Results: Both crown materials showed stress concentration at the force application site mainly on the intaglio palatal surface of the crown. However, more stress values were observed within zirconia crowns. All posts showed stress concentration at their buccal sides. However, more stress values were observed in zirconia and metal cast posts compared to glass fiber posts that transfer more stress to root dentin.

Conclusions: Post and crown materials affect the stress distribution in the tooth-restoration complex. Using high elastic modulus posts slightly decreased stress in root dentin despite concentrating more stress within their structure. However, glass fiber posts resulted in more homogenous stress distribution in the tooth-restoration complex. Crown material did not influence the stress distribution in root dentin. Custom-made posts decreased stress within crowns, regardless of the crown material. However, more stress values were observed within zirconia crowns. Custom-made zirconia posts and cores showed a similar stress distribution as non-precious metal cast posts, so they may be used as a suitable option where esthetic is desirable.

Keywords: 3d finite element method; cast metal post and core; computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (cad/cam); glass fiber post; post and core; stress distribution; zirconia post.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Model components: (A) crown, (B) crown-cement, (C) composite core, (D) prefabricated post, (E, J) post cement, (F) dentin, (G) gutta-percha, (H) periodontal ligament, (I) custom-made post, (K) cortical bone and (L) trabecular bone
Figure 2
Figure 2. Meshing process
Figure 3
Figure 3. Force direction and boundary condition
Figure 4
Figure 4. Stress distribution in (A) crown, (B) dentin, (C) post, (D) tooth-restoration complex in all models (crown material: zirconia)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Stress distribution in (A) crown, (B) dentin, (C) post, (D) tooth-restoration complex in all models (crown material: lithium disilicate)

References

    1. In vitro evaluation of the fracture strength of all-ceramic core materials on zirconium posts. Ozcan N, Sahin E. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:455–460. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. J Endod. 2010;36:1439–1449. - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- a finite element analysis. Nahar R, Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10:719–726. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. Veríssimo C, Simamoto Júnior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PC. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:234–246. - PubMed
    1. Comparative evaluation of different post materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth using the finite element analysis method: a systematic review. Badami V, Ketineni H, Pb S, Akarapu S, Mittapalli SP, Khan A. Cureus. 2022;14:0. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources