The cost-effectiveness of tailored smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental illness: a model-based economic evaluation
- PMID: 36798753
- PMCID: PMC9925867
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101828
The cost-effectiveness of tailored smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental illness: a model-based economic evaluation
Abstract
Background: Tailored smoking cessation interventions, which combine behavioural and pharmaceutical support, are effective in populations with severe mental illness (SMI). We establish the cost-effectiveness of two tailored interventions in the UK: (i) a bespoke smoking cessation intervention (BSCI) versus usual care, and (ii) integrated tobacco cessation and mental health care (IC) versus standard smoking cessation clinic (SCC) referral.
Methods: This economic evaluation was conducted between January 15th 2019 and August 4th 2022. We adapted a Markov model estimating smoking status, healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) across the lifetime. Intervention effectiveness and costs were obtained from a systematic review and a meta-analysis. We obtained specific parameter values for populations with SMI for mortality, risk of smoking related comorbidities, and health utility. Uncertainty was analysed in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).
Findings: The BSCI was cost-effective versus usual care with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £3145 per QALY (incremental costs: £165; incremental QALYs: 0.05). Integrated care was cost-effective versus SCC with an ICER of £6875 per QALY (incremental costs: £292; incremental QALYs: 0.04). The BSCI and IC were cost-effective in 89% and 83% of PSA iterations respectively. The main area of uncertainty related to relapse rates.
Interpretation: Our findings suggested that the tailored interventions were cost-effective and could increase QALYs and decrease expenditure on treating smoking related morbidities if offered to people with SMI.
Funding: York Health Economics Consortium was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to produce economic evaluations to inform public health guidelines.
Keywords: Cessation; Cost-effectiveness; Severe mental illness; Smoking; Tobacco.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Allender S., Balakrishnan R., Scarborough P., Webster P., Rayner M. The burden of smoking-related ill health in the UK. Tob control. 2009;18(4):262–267. - PubMed
-
- Ali S., Godfrey C.A., Parrott S. Public Health Research Consortium; University of York; York: 2011. Economic model of adult smoking related costs and consequences for England.
-
- Lipari RN, Van Horn S. Smoking and mental illness among adults in the United States. The CBHSQ report 2017. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous