Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 31:13:1042552.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1042552. eCollection 2023.

Precise diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer - A clinical perspective

Affiliations
Review

Precise diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer - A clinical perspective

Yongjun Yang et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

According to the guidelines, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical therapy remains the standard strategy for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, even if patients receive standard strategy, the risk of postoperative recurrence and progression is high. From the clinical perspective, the standard strategy needs to be optimized and improved. Compared to conventional TURBT, the technique of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) removes the tumor tissue in one piece, thus following the principles of cancer surgery. Meanwhile, the integrity and spatial orientation of tumor tissue is protected during the operation, which is helpful for pathologists to make accurate histopathological analysis. Then, urologists can make a postoperative individualized treatment plan based on the patient's clinical characteristics and histopathological results. To date, there is no strong evidence that NMIBC patients treated with ERBT achieve better oncological prognosis, which indicates that ERBT alone does not yet improve patient outcomes. With the development of enhanced imaging technology and proteogenomics technology, en bloc resection combined with these technologies will make it possible to achieve precise diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. In this review, the authors analyze the current existing shortcomings of en bloc resection and points out its future direction, in order to promote continuous optimization of the management strategy of bladder cancer.

Keywords: bladder cancer; en bloc resection; enhanced imaging; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; precision medicine; proteogenomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the precise diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC. (Left). For patients with suspected NMIBC, when the tumor diameter is less than 3cm, the whole tumor tissue is resected under the guidance of enhanced optical imaging. The urologist can completely remove tumor tissue under the guidance of enhanced optical imaging, and the pathologist can make accurate histopathological analysis after obtaining tumor samples. Complete transurethral tumor resection and accurate tumor risk stratification are beneficial to reducing the risk of recurrence and progression after surgery. (Right). When the tumor was larger than 3 cm in diameter, the exophytic part of the tumor was first removed in a whole piece, collected in an elastic bag and crushed into several pieces, and then taken out from the bladder for proteogenomics analysis. The tumor base containing DM was then en bloc resected for histopathological analysis. The whole tumor exophytic part collected in the elastic bag provides sufficient pathological specimens for proteogenomics analysis, while the tumor base containing DM facilitates histopathological analysis by pathologists, including T1 substaging, LVI, and histological variation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, Mshs MD. Bladder cancer: A review. JAMA (2020) 324(19):1980–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17598 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, et al. . European Association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ). Eur Urol. (2022) 81(1):75–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. . Bladder cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2020) 18(3):329–54. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, et al. . Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol. (2016) 196(4):1021–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.049 - DOI - PubMed