Using the emotional functioning in clinical practice to detect psychological distress in patients with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer
- PMID: 36800957
- PMCID: PMC9936733
- DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02099-w
Using the emotional functioning in clinical practice to detect psychological distress in patients with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with advanced cancer suffer significant decline of their psychological state. A rapid and reliable evaluation of this state is essential to detect and treat it and improve quality of life. The aim was to probe the usefulness of the emotional function (EF) subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30) to assess psychological distress in cancer patients.
Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving 15 Spanish hospitals. Patients diagnosed with unresectable advanced thoracic or colorectal cancer were included. Participants completed the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), the current the gold standard, and the EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess their psychological distress prior to initiating systemic antineoplastic treatment. Accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.
Results: The sample comprised 639 patients: 283 with advanced thoracic cancer and 356 with advanced colorectal cancer. According to the BSI scale, 74% and 66% displayed psychological distress with an EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 accuracy of 79% and 76% in detecting psychological distress in individuals with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer, respectively. Sensitivity was 79 and 75% and specificity was 79 and 77% with a PPV of 92 and 86% and a NPV of 56 and 61% (scale cut-off point, 75) for patients with advanced thoracic and colorectal cancer, respectively. The mean AUC for thoracic cancer was 0.84 and, for colorectal cancer, it was 0.85.
Conclusion: This study reveals that the EF-EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscale is a simple and effective tool for detecting psychological distress in people with advanced cancer.
Keywords: Advanced cancer; EORTC-QLQ-C30; Emotional function; Psychological distress; Sensitivity; Specificity.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Emotional functioning to screen for psychological distress in breast and colorectal cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment initiation.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13005. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13005. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019. PMID: 30761638
-
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jul;46(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Nov 27. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013. PMID: 23195392
-
Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07793-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33499819 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of EORTC quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;19(6):554-60. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0609-1. Epub 2004 Jun 16. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 15205989
-
Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3661-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3270-7. Epub 2016 May 18. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27193118 Review.
Cited by
-
Association between pretreatment emotional distress and neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade response in melanoma.Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):3090-3099. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02631-x. Epub 2023 Nov 13. Nat Med. 2023. PMID: 37957378
-
Psychological distress and coping strategies in breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241276232. doi: 10.1177/17455057241276232. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39287572 Free PMC article.
-
Global research trends on gastrointestinal cancer and mental health (2004-2024): a bibliographic study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 28;12:1515853. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1515853. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39935799 Free PMC article.
-
Quality indicators and patient outcome measures for palliative care in cancer patients: a systematic review.Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Jun 20;19:1929. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1929. eCollection 2025. Ecancermedicalscience. 2025. PMID: 40606950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emotional Functioning in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study on Its Influence and Key Predictors.Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 6;17(9):1574. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091574. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361500 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical