Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term
- PMID: 36801968
- PMCID: PMC10808154
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06891-9
Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter (DBC) and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just for multipara at term.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among multipara at term with a Bishop score < 6 who needed planned labor induction from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020 in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. They were divided into DBC group and dinoprostone group, respectively. Baseline maternal data, maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Total vaginal delivery rate, rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h, rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal fetal heart rate(FHR) were regarded as the primary outcome variables. The difference between groups was considered statistically significant when p value < 0.05.
Results: A total of 202 multiparas was included for analysis (95 women in DBC group vs 107 women in dinoprostone group). There were no significant differences in total vaginal delivery rate and rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h between groups. Uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal FHR occurred exclusively in dinoprostone group.
Conclusion: DBC and dinoprostone seem to be equally effective, while, DBC seems to be safer than dinoprostone.
Keywords: Dinoprostone; Double balloon catheter; Induction of labor; Multipara; Vaginal delivery.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
[Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Oct;45(10):521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017. PMID: 28757105 French.
-
Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1805-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.880880. Epub 2014 Feb 3. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. PMID: 24397441 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening: a propensity score matching retrospective study.Ginekol Pol. 2025;96(3):161-167. doi: 10.5603/gpl.101957. Epub 2024 Nov 8. Ginekol Pol. 2025. PMID: 39513239
-
Double-balloon catheter vs dinoprostone (PGE-2) insert for labour induction: A meta-analysis of 2493 pregnancies.Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 Apr;27(4):84-95. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i4.10. Afr J Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37584912 Review.
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36996264 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources