Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 20;17(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00354-z.

Prevention of incisional surgical site infection by subfascial closed suction drainage after open laparotomy: a single surgeon experience in 250 consecutive patients

Affiliations

Prevention of incisional surgical site infection by subfascial closed suction drainage after open laparotomy: a single surgeon experience in 250 consecutive patients

Hiroshi Isozaki. Patient Saf Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Open laparotomy with gastroenterological surgery is a surgical procedure results in a relatively high rate (about 10% or more) of incisional surgical site infection (SSI). To reduce incisional SSI after open laparotomy, mechanical preventors, such as subcutaneous wound drainage or negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), have been tried; however, conclusive results have not been obtained. This study evaluated the prevention of incisional SSI by first subfascial closed suction drainage after open laparotomy.

Methods: A total of 453 consecutive patients who underwent open laparotomy with gastroenterological surgery by one surgeon in one hospital (between August 1, 2011, and August 31, 2022) was investigated. Same absorbable threads and ring drapes were used in this period. Subfascial drainage was used in consecutive 250 patients in the later period (between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2022). The incidences of SSIs in the subfascial drainage group were compared to those of in the no subfascial drainage group.

Results: (a) No incisional SSI (superficial and deep) occurred in the subfascial drainage group (superficial = 0% [0/250] and deep = 0% [0/250]). As a result, incidences of incisional SSI of the subfascial drainage group were significantly lower than those of the no subfascial drainage group (superficial = 8.9% [18/203]; deep = 3.4% [7/203]) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). (b) Four out of seven deep incisional SSI patients in the no subfascial drainage group underwent debridement and re-suture under lumbar or general anesthesia. (c) There was no significant difference in the incidences of organ/space SSI of the two groups (3.4% [7/203] in the no subfascial drainage group and 5.2% [13/250] in the subfascial drainage group) (P = 0.491).

Conclusion: Subfascial drainage was associated with no incisional SSI after open laparotomy with gastroenterological surgery.

Keywords: Gastroenterological surgery; Incisional surgical site infection; Laparotomy; Subfascial closed suction drainage; Surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
7F conventional drain tube with discontinuous small holes (tkb SurgicalProducts, TOKIBO)® and a low-pressure (30–80 mmHg), continuous-aspiration portable reservoir (Bulb-type 100 ml)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schema of closure of abdominal wall and placement of subfascial drain tube
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subfascial drainage along the full length of the subfascial incision. Exit of the drain was placed separate from the incision at the caudal site, and connected to a low-pressure (30–80 mmHg), continuous-aspiration portable reservoir (Bulb-type 100 ml)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–132. doi: 10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garner JS. CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control. 1986;7:193–200. doi: 10.1017/S0195941700064080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Itatsu K, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, et al. The Benefits of a Wound Protector in Preventing Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Elective Open Digestive Surgery. A Large-Scale Cohort Study. World J Surg. 2017;41(11):2715–2722. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4082-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Utsumi M, Yamada T, Yamabe K, et al. Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Imamura K, Adachi K, Sasaki R, et al. Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(12):2083–2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3283-z. - DOI - PubMed