Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 17;13(1):2855.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29563-3.

Baseline characteristics in the Israel refraction, environment, and devices (iREAD) study

Affiliations

Baseline characteristics in the Israel refraction, environment, and devices (iREAD) study

Einat Shneor et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present baseline data from a longitudinal study assessing behavioral factors in three groups of boys in Israel with varying myopia prevalence. Ultra-Orthodox (N = 57), religious (N = 67), and secular (N = 44) Jewish boys (age 8.6 ± 1.4 years) underwent cycloplegic autorefraction and axial-length measurement. Time-outdoors and physical-activity were assessed objectively using an Actiwatch. Ocular history, educational factors, and near-work were assessed with a questionnaire. Group effects were tested and mixed effects logistic and linear regression were used to evaluate behaviors and their relationship to myopia. The prevalence of myopia (≤ - 0.50D) varied by group (ultra-Orthodox: 46%, religious: 25%, secular: 20%, P < 0.021). Refraction was more myopic in the ultra-Orthodox group (P = 0.001). Ultra-Orthodox boys learned to read at a younger age (P < 0.001), spent more hours in school (P < 0.001), spent less time using electronic devices (P < 0.001), and on weekdays, spent less time outdoors (P = 0.02). Increased hours in school (OR 1.70) and near-work (OR 1.22), increased the odds of myopia. Being ultra-Orthodox (P < 0.05) and increased near-work (P = 0.007) were associated with a more negative refraction. Several factors were associated with the prevalence and degree of myopia in young boys in Israel, including being ultra-Orthodox, learning to read at a younger age, and spending more hours in school.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protocol, recruitment, and enrollment for the 18-month iREAD study. Baseline analysis (N = 168) is presented in this paper. *11 boys were excluded: 3 had less than 6/9 acuity, 1 had less than 6/9 acuity and high astigmatism, 4 had high hyperopia, 3 had high astigmatism. 5 boys were excluded: 4 provided less than 4 days of valid Actiwatch data and 1 did not fill out the questionnaire.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Environmental and behavioral measures. Mean ± standard deviation daily (A) time outdoors (hours), (B) light exposure (lux), (C) activity (counts per 15 s), (D) near work (hours), (E) electronic device use (hours), and (F) television (hours), are shown for weekdays, Shabbat, and the whole week (overall) for ultra-Orthodox (filled bars), religious (gray bars), and secular (open bars) children; P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Activity in counts per 15 s (CP15) and light exposure (lux) analyzed by hour. Activity in counts per 15 s (CP15) and light exposure (lux) analyzed by hour for weekdays (A,C) and Shabbat (B,D) for ultra-Orthodox (UO, triangles), religious (R, squares), and secular (S, circles) groups; error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; post-hoc pairwise comparisons P < 0.05: *UO < S, UO < R, R < S, ¥S < R, #S < UO, §R < UO.

References

    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . The Impact of Myopia and High Myopia: Report of the Joint World Health Organization: Report of the Joint World Health Organization-Brien Holden Vision Institute Global Scientific Meeting on Myopia. University of New South Wales; 2015. pp. 1–40.
    1. Shapira Y, Mimouni M, Machluf Y, Chaiter Y, Saab H, Mezer E. The increasing burden of myopia in Israel among young adults over a generation: Analysis of predisposing factors. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(12):1617–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H, Naduvilath T, Zou H, Frick KD, Marmamula S, Friedman DS, Lamoureux E, Keeffe J, Walline JJ, Fricke TR, Kovai V, Resnikoff S. IMI impact of myopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(5):2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.5.2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL., 3rd Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632–1639. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types