Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 14;108(8):e512-e520.
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad063.

Pelvis Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Familial Partial Lipodystrophy

Affiliations

Pelvis Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Familial Partial Lipodystrophy

Suleyman Cem Adiyaman et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Context: The diagnosis of familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) is currently made based on clinical judgment.

Objective: There is a need for objective diagnostic tools that can diagnose FPLD accurately.

Methods: We have developed a new method that uses measurements from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the pubis level. We evaluated measurements from a lipodystrophy cohort (n = 59; median age [25th-75th percentiles]: 32 [24-44]; 48 females and 11 males) and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 29). Another dataset included MRIs from 289 consecutive patients.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a potential cut-point of ≤13 mm gluteal fat thickness for the diagnosis of FPLD. A combination of gluteal fat thickness ≤13 mm and pubic/gluteal fat ratio ≥2.5 (based on a receiver operating characteristic curve) provided 96.67% (95% CI, 82.78-99.92) sensitivity and 91.38% (95% CI, 81.02-97.14) specificity in the overall cohort and 100.00% (95% CI, 87.23-100.00) sensitivity and 90.00% (95% CI, 76.34-97.21) specificity in females for the diagnosis of FPLD. When this approach was tested in a larger dataset of random patients, FPLD was differentiated from subjects without lipodystrophy with 96.67% (95% CI, 82.78-99.92) sensitivity and 100.00% (95% CI, 98.73-100.00) specificity. When only women were analyzed, the sensitivity and the specificity was 100.00% (95% CI, 87.23-100.00 and 97.95-100.00, respectively). The performance of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat thickness ratio was comparable to readouts performed by radiologists with expertise in lipodystrophy.

Conclusion: The combined use of gluteal fat thickness and pubic/gluteal fat ratio from pelvic MRI is a promising method to diagnose FPLD that can reliably identify FPLD in women. Our findings need to be tested in larger populations and prospectively.

Keywords: familial partial lipodystrophy; gluteal fat; pelvic MRI; pubic fat.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources