Does Coronary Plaque Morphology Matter Beyond Plaque Burden?
- PMID: 36808390
- DOI: 10.1007/s11883-023-01088-0
Does Coronary Plaque Morphology Matter Beyond Plaque Burden?
Abstract
Purpose of review: Imaging of adverse coronary plaque features by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has advanced greatly and at a fast pace. We aim to describe the evolution, present and future in plaque analysis, and its value in comparison to plaque burden.
Recent findings: Recently, it has been demonstrated that in addition to plaque burden, quantitative and qualitative assessment of coronary plaque by CCTA can improve the prediction of future major adverse cardiovascular events in diverse coronary artery disease scenarios. The detection of high-risk non-obstructive coronary plaque can lead to higher use of preventive medical therapies such as statins and aspirin, help identify culprit plaque, and differentiate between myocardial infarction types. Even more, over traditional plaque burden, plaque analysis including pericoronary inflammation can potentially be useful tools for tracking disease progression and response to medical therapy. The identification of the higher risk phenotypes with plaque burden, plaque characteristics, or ideally both can allow the allocation of targeted therapies and potentially monitor response. Further observational data are now required to investigate these key issues in diverse populations, followed by rigorous randomized controlled trials.
Keywords: CAC; Coronary artery disease; Plaque burden; Plaque morphology.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
-
- Gulati M, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144(22):e368–454. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029 . - DOI
-
- Williams MC, Earls JP, Hecht H. Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaque, recent progress and current limitations. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16(2):124–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCCT.2021.07.001 . Very comprehensive review of the latest available solutions for CCTA advanced plaque analysis and their most common pitfalls. - DOI
-
- van Veelen A, van der Sangen NMR, Henriques JPS, Claessen BEPM. Identification and treatment of the vulnerable coronary plaque. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23(1). https://doi.org/10.31083/J.RCM2301039 .
-
- Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(7):1282–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739 . - DOI
-
- Gaba P, Gersh BJ, Muller J, Narula J, Stone GW. Evolving concepts of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and the vulnerable patient: implications for patient care and future research. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022; Sep 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41569-022-00769-8 .
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials