Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 20;38(7):e50.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e50.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Affiliations

Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Kuntay Kaplan et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: As in every field, online information has become increasingly used in health. However, it is well known that some information online containing health advice is incorrect and may even include false statements. For this reason, it is crucial for public health that individuals reach reliable, high-quality resources when they are trying to obtain health information. Studies have been conducted on the quality and reliability of online information about many diseases, but no similar study has been found in the literature on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: In this descriptive study, videos on YouTube (www.youtube.com) about HCC were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN tool.

Results: While 129 (89.58%) of the videos examined within the study were considered useful, 15 (10.42%) were misleading. The GQS scores of the videos considered useful were significantly higher than the scores of the misleading videos, with a median (min-max) score of 4 (2-5) (P < 0.001). When we compared the DISCERN scores, the scores of the useful videos were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the scores of the misleading videos.

Conclusion: YouTube should be considered a complex structure where accurate and reliable health information can be presented, as well as erroneous and misleading information. Users should understand the importance of video sources and focus their research on videos from doctors, academics, and universities.

Keywords: Education; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Quality of Information; YouTube.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The screening process for study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gilles H, Garbutt T, Landrum J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2022;34(3):289–301. - PubMed
    1. Madihi S, Syed H, Lazar F, Zyad A, Benani A. A systematic review of the current hepatitis B viral infection and hepatocellular carcinoma situation in mediterranean countries. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:7027169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hong YM, Yoon KT, Cho M, Kang DH, Kim HW, Choi CW, et al. Trends and patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(3):403–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: a systematic review. Milbank Q. 2014;92(1):7–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173–194. - PubMed