Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;49(4):1627-1637.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02244-6. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)

Affiliations

Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)

Lina Holmberg et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau.

Methods: On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70-84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6-0.79), moderate (0.4-0.59) or weak (< 0.4).

Results: The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%.

Conclusions: The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement.

Keywords: Accuracy; Comparability; Correctness; Timeliness; Trauma registry; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patient population
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Accuracy and correctness of variables. RR respiratory rate, EMS emergency medical services, NISS New Injury Severity Score, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, SBP systolic blood pressure, GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Data completeness and missing data. SBP systolic blood pressure, GOS Glasgow Coma Scale, CT computed tomography, ISS Injury Severity Score, NISS New Injury Severity Score, ASA score American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, EMS emergency medical services, RR respiratory rate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Days between trauma date and registration date in SweTrau. Min = 2 days, Max = 516 days, Median = 139 days

Comment in

References

    1. Linder G, et al. Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(10):1326–1335. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10234. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moberger P, Sköldberg F, Birgisson H. Evaluation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry: an overview of completeness, timeliness, comparability and validity. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(12):1611–1621. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1529425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Venermo M, Lees T. International Vascunet Validation of the Swedvasc Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(6):802–808. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsen IK, et al. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(7):1218–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bågenholm A, et al. Injury coding in a national trauma registry: a one-year validation audit in a level 1 trauma centre. BMC Emerg Med. 2019;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0276-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources