Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;52(5):20230024.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230024. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives

Affiliations

MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives

Karthik Sennimalai et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to explore the current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a cephalometric tool, summarize the equipment design and methods, and propose recommendations for future research.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases, including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, LILACS, and Cochrane Library, using broad search terms. The articles published in any language till June 2022 were considered. Cephalometric studies conducted using the MRI dataset on human participants, phantom or cadaver were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the final eligible articles using the quality assessment score (QAS).

Results: Nine studies were included in the final assessment. Studies used various methods, including 1.5 T or 3 T MRI systems and 3D or 2D MRI datasets. Among the imaging sequences, T1-weighted, T2-weighted and black bone MR images were used for cephalometric analysis. In addition, the reference standards varied among studies, such as traditional 2D cephalogram, cone-beam CT and phantom measurements. The mean QAS of all the included studies was 79% (± 14.4%). The main limitation of most studies was the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the methods, statistical tools used, and metric outcomes assessed.

Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity and lack of metrological evidence on the effectiveness of MRI-based cephalometric analysis, the preliminary results demonstrated by in vivo and in vitro studies are encouraging. However, future studies exploring MRI sequences specific to cephalometric diagnosis are required for wider adoption of this technique in routine orthodontic practice.

Keywords: cephalometry; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; nonionising radiation; orthodontics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no competing financial or personal interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Some common skeletal, dental and soft tissue landmarks depicted in the multiplanar reconstructed view (sagittal) of T 2-weighted MR images (N', soft tissue nasion; Prn, pronasale (nose tip); UL, upper lip; LL, lower lip; Pog', soft tissue pogonion; Me', soft tissue menton; N, nasion; S, sella; Ba, basion; ANS, anterior nasal spine; PNS, posterior nasal spine; Pog, pogonion; Me, menton; T, tip of tongue; P, tip of soft palate; U1T, tip of maxillary central incisor; U1A, apex of maxillary central incisor; U6, mesiobuccal cusp tip of maxillary first molar; L6, mesiobuccal cusp tip of mandibular first molar; Co, condylion; Go, gonion)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The PRISMA flow diagram showing the process of identification, inclusion and exclusion of the studies (*search restricted to first 300 records)

References

    1. Kharbanda OP. Orthodontics: Diagnosis and management of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities. In: Kharbanda OP, ed. Cephalometrics: Historical perspectives, methods and landmarks. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India : Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019., : 234
    1. Hans MG, Palomo JM, Valiathan M. History of imaging in orthodontics from broadbent to cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 914–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Digital radiography for the orthodontist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 231–192. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.121366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambrose J, Hounsfield G. Computerized transverse axial tomography. Br J Radiol 1973; 46: 148–49. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 245–48. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600448 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms