Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Experimental Design for the Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L

In: Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L: A Compendium, Comparative Review & User Guide [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. Chapter 3.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Experimental Design for the Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L

Mark Oppe et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The EQ-VT protocol for valuing the EQ-5D-5L offered the opportunity to develop a standardised experimental design to elicit EQ-5D-5L values. This chapter sets out the various aspects of the EQ-VT design and the basis on which methodological choices were made in regard to the stated preference methods used, i.e., composite time trade-off (cTTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCE). These choices include the sub-set of EQ-5D-5L health states to value using these methods; the number of cTTO and DCE valuation tasks per respondent; the minimum sample size needed; and the randomisation schema. This chapter also summarises the research studies developing and testing alternative experimental designs aimed at generating a “Lite” version of the EQ-VT design. This “Lite” version aimed to reduce the number of health states in the design, and thus the sample size, to increase the feasibility of undertaking valuation studies in countries with limited resources or recruitment possibilities. Finally, this chapter outlines remaining methodological issues to be addressed in future research, focusing on refinement of current design strategies, and identification of new designs for novel valuation approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Augustovski F, Belizán M, Gibbons L, Reyes N, Stolk E, Craig BM, Tejada RA (2020) Peruvian valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: a direct comparison of time trade-off and discrete choice experiments. Value Health 23(7):880–888 - PubMed
    1. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095–1108 - PubMed
    1. Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, Wasi N (2010) The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark Sci 29(3):393–421
    1. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2005) Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, New York
    1. Janssen BM, Oppe M, Versteegh MM, Stolk EA (2013) Introducing the composite time trade-off: a test of feasibility and face validity. Eur J Health Econ 14(Suppl 1):S5–S13 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources