Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Where Next for EQ-5D-5L National Value Sets and the EQ-VT Protocol?

In: Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L: A Compendium, Comparative Review & User Guide [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. Chapter 7.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Where Next for EQ-5D-5L National Value Sets and the EQ-VT Protocol?

Richard Norman et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The purpose of this chapter is to reflect on the future of EQ-5D-5L valuation studies, going beyond the value sets summarised in this book. This includes a number of linked themes. First, the EQ-5D-5L valuation research programme has allowed the continued evolution of methods, as methodological studies have demonstrated that aspects of the EQ-VT protocol could be strengthened or improved. This chapter describes some of the key candidates for future refinement of the methods for valuing EQ-5D-5L. Second, while the standardisation of valuation methodology is important, it is anticipated that many countries may require a less resource-intensive, but still rigorous version of the valuation protocol. This chapter outlines the progress towards developing a ‘lite’ version of the EQ-VT protocol, and considers the future possibility of valuation protocols based exclusively on discrete choice experiments, with accompanying strengths and weaknesses. Finally, the ‘shelf-life’ of value sets is considered, along with how demographic and other societal changes may manifest in how people value health, and the implications of that for the need to update EQ-5D-5L value sets.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Attema AE, Brouwer W (2014) Constant proportional trade-offs and health state evaluations. In: Michalos AC (ed) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer, Dordrecht
    1. Augustovski F, Belizán M, Gibbons L, Reyes N, Stolk E, Craig BM, Tejada RA (2020) Peruvian valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: a direct comparison of time trade-off and discrete choice experiments. Value Health 23(7):880–888 - PubMed
    1. Burström K, Teni FS, Gerdtham UG, Leidl R, Helgesson G, Rolfson O, Henriksson M (2020) Experience-based Swedish TTO and VAS value sets for EQ-5D-5L health states. PharmacoEconomics 38(8):839–856 - PubMed
    1. Craig BM, Rand K (2018) Choice defines QALYs: a US valuation of the EQ-5D-5L. Med Care 56(6):529–536 - PubMed
    1. Craig BM, Rand K, Bailey H, Stalmeier PFM (2018) Quality-adjusted life-years without constant proportionality. Value Health 21(9):1124–1131 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources