Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;8(1):20.
doi: 10.3390/jfmk8010020.

Relationship between Maximum Force-Velocity Exertion and Swimming Performances among Four Strokes over Medium and Short Distances: The Stronger on Dry Land, the Faster in Water?

Affiliations

Relationship between Maximum Force-Velocity Exertion and Swimming Performances among Four Strokes over Medium and Short Distances: The Stronger on Dry Land, the Faster in Water?

Vincenzo Sorgente et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. .

Abstract

Evaluating force-velocity characteristics on dry-land is of the utmost importance in swimming, because higher levels of these bio-motor abilities positively affect in-water performance. However, the wide range of possible technical specializations presents an opportunity for a more categorized approach that has yet to be seized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify feasible differences in maximum force-velocity exertion based on swimmers' stroke and distance specialization. To this scope, 96 young male swimmers competing at the regional level were divided into 12 groups, one for each stroke (butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, and front crawl) and distance (50 m, 100 m, and 200 m). They performed two single pull-up tests, 5-min before and after competing in a federal swimming race. We assessed force (N) and velocity (m/s) exertion via linear encoder. There were no significant differences between pre-post maximum force-velocity exertions, despite the decreasing trend. Force-parameters highly correlated with each other and with the swimming performance time. Moreover, both force (t = -3.60, p < 0.001) and velocity (t = -3.90, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of swimming race time. Sprinters (both 50 m and 100 m) of all strokes could exert significantly higher force-velocity compared to 200 m swimmers (e.g., 0.96 ± 0.06 m/s performed by sprinters vs. 0.66 ± 0.03 m/s performed by 200 m swimmers). Moreover, breaststroke sprinters presented significantly lower force-velocity compared to sprinters specialized in the other strokes (e.g., 1047.83 ± 61.33 N performed by breaststroke sprinters vs. 1263.62 ± 161.23 N performed by butterfly sprinters). This study could provide the foundation for future research regarding the role of stroke and distance specializations in modeling swimmers' force-velocity abilities, thus influencing paramount elements for specific training and improvement towards competitions.

Keywords: exercise physiology; sport performance; sport science; strength training; swimming performance; training prescription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatter plot showing the maximum force–velocity exertion of the swimmers, grouped by stroke, and differentiated by swimming race distance. As shown by the best line fit, the high correlation between the force and velocity values in the single pull-up test reflects an almost linear trend. This is particularly evident within the 50 m and 100 m groups of swimmers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter box plot showing the maximum force (N; panel (a)) and velocity (m/s; panel (b)) exerted in the single pull-up test, before the swimming competition. (a) Within all four strokes, a trend emerged where the sprinters (both 50 m and 100 m) could exert significantly higher forces compared to the medium-distance swimmers. Although it remained statistically significant, this trend was less evident regarding the breaststroke swimmers. (b) The 50 m and 100 m breaststroke swimmers presented significantly lower levels of velocity in the single pull-up test compared to the swimmers of other strokes competing in the same distance. However, this was not the case with the group of 200 m swimmers, where there were no significant differences among the groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang C.-H., Chang C.-C., Liang Y.-M., Shih C.-M., Chiu W.-S., Tseng P., Hung D.L., Tzeng O.J.L., Muggleton N.G., Juan C.-H. Open vs. closed skill sports and the modulation of inhibitory control. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e55773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055773. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadowski J., Mastalerz A., Gromisz W. Transfer of dry-land resistance training modalities to swimming performance. J. Hum. Kinet. 2020;74:195–203. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaro N.M., Marinho D.A., Marques M.C., Batalha N.P., Morouço P.G. Effects of Dry-Land Strength and Conditioning Programs in Age Group Swimmers. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017;31:2447–2454. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crowley E., Harrison A.J., Lyons M. The impact of resistance training on swimming performance: A systematic review. Sport. Med. 2017;47:2285–2307. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0730-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mujika I., Halson S., Burke L.M., Balagué G., Farrow D. An integrated, multifactorial approach to periodization for optimal performance in individual and team sports. Int. J. Sport. Physiol. Perform. 2018;13:538–561. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0093. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources