Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 30;14(2):137-151.
doi: 10.11621/pir2021.0109. eCollection 2021.

Free Will as a Paradox: Empirical Evaluation of the Construct of Everyday Consciousness

Eugeny L Dotsenko  1 , Olga V Pchelina  1
Affiliations

Free Will as a Paradox: Empirical Evaluation of the Construct of Everyday Consciousness

Eugeny L Dotsenko et al. Psychol Russ. .

Abstract

Background: Free will belongs to the category of phenomena that are actively discussed in scientific discourse but are neither verified nor proven false. Free will is studied in philosophy, neuroscience, and psychology. We discuss this pluralism, multiplicity of perceptions, and the parties' arguments in the theoretical part of this article. We approach the existing polemics from the point of view of a person who is in the moment of making a decision and taking responsibility for it. The usual paradoxes are mitigated if we consider free will through the concepts underlying everyday consciousness.

Objective: Our aim is to introduce into the discussion of free will an understanding of its nature as a construct of everyday consciousness, one which acts as a factor in increasing the personal maturity of vital decisions. We also discuss the arguments of the various meta-positions in the dispute about free will.

Design: Our empirical research was designed as a modification of the experiments on imposed attitudes. The sample consisted of 340 people ages 30-50 years.

Results: The level of maturity of actions by the subjects who received the set for determinism was lower than that of the subjects who received the set for free will (U 5133; p = 0.014).

Conclusion: Our study showed that the stronger a person's belief in free will, the more personally mature that person's choices - actions - are; and that the more active that belief in free will, the more effective are their efforts to overcome social pressure.

Keywords: belief in free will; decision making; deed (action); free will; free will as illusion.; neuroscience; personality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Indicators of the maturity of actions by persons with different beliefs in free will in the three groups of subjects
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Indicators of the maturity of deeds in persons with different beliefs in free will in the three groups of subjects
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alquist, J.L., Ainsworth, S.E., & Baumeister, R.F. (2013). Determined to conform: Disbelief in free will increases conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 80–86. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.015 - DOI
    1. Anderson, N.E., & Kiehl, K.A. (2020). Re-wiring Guilt: How Advancing Neuroscience Encourages Strategic Interventions Over Retributive Justice. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 390. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00390 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bargh, J. (2008). Free will is un-natural. In Baer J., Kaufmann J., & Baumeister R. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and Free Will (pp. 128–154). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0007 - DOI
    1. Baumeister, R.F., Masicampo, E.J., & DeWall, C.N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(2), 260–268. 10.1177/0146167208327217 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baumeister, R.F., & Monroe, A.E. (2014). Recent Research on Free Will: Conceptualizations, Beliefs, and Processes. In Zanna M.P., & Olson J.M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–52). Burlington: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00001-1 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources