Prospective Randomized Trial of Biologic Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
- PMID: 36811557
- DOI: 10.1177/03635465231154601
Prospective Randomized Trial of Biologic Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Abstract
Background: Although initial studies have demonstrated that concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) injections promote rotator cuff repair (RCR) healing, there are no randomized prospective studies investigating clinical efficacy.
Hypothesis/purpose: To compare outcomes after arthroscopic RCR (aRCR) with and without cBMA augmentation. It was hypothesized that cBMA augmentation would result in statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes and rotator cuff structural integrity.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Patients indicated for aRCR of isolated 1- to 3-cm supraspinatus tendon tears were randomized to receive adjunctive cBMA injection or sham incision. Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest, concentrated using a commercially available system, and injected at the aRCR site after repair. Patients were assessed preoperatively and serially until 2 years postoperatively via the following functional indices: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 1 year to assess rotator cuff structural integrity according to Sugaya classification. Treatment failure was defined as decreased 1- or 2-year ASES or SANE scores as compared with preoperative baseline, the need for revision RCR, or conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty.
Results: An overall 91 patients were enrolled (control, n = 45; cBMA, n = 46): 82 (90%) completed 2-year clinical follow-up and 75 (82%) completed 1-year MRI. Functional indices significantly improved in both groups by 6 months and were sustained at 1 and 2 years (all P < .05). The control group showed significantly greater evidence of rotator cuff retear according to Sugaya classification on 1-year MRI (57% vs 18%; P < .001). Treatment failed for 7 patients in each group (control, 16%; cBMA, 15%).
Conclusion: cBMA-augmented aRCR of isolated supraspinatus tendon tears may result in a structurally superior repair but largely fails to significantly improve treatment failure rates and patient-reported clinical outcomes when compared with aRCR alone. Additional study is warranted to investigate the long-term benefits of improved repair quality on clinical outcomes and repair failure rates.
Registration: NCT02484950 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Keywords: bone marrow aspirate; clinical trial; rotator cuff.
Similar articles
-
Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Reinforcement of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improves Cuff Integrity.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0363546518816689. Epub 2018 Dec 31. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30596519
-
Clinical Outcomes, Tendon Integrity, and Shoulder Strength After Revision Rotator Cuff Reconstruction: A Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2700-2706. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786006. Epub 2018 Aug 7. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 30084649
-
Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears Showed Lower Short-term Retear Rates After Arthroscopic Double-Layer Repair Versus Bursal Layer-Only Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):689-696. doi: 10.1177/0363546519897033. Epub 2020 Jan 9. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31917608 Clinical Trial.
-
A Systematic Review of Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic and Open/Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repairs.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jun;51(7):1904-1913. doi: 10.1177/03635465211073332. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 35179393
-
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biologically enhanced patch augmentation.Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Feb;34(1):4-12. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00754-3. Epub 2021 Dec 10. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34890027 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Rotator cuff tears.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00492-3. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024. PMID: 38332156 Review.
-
Fostering International Knowledge Sharing and Clinical Excellence: A Partnership and Inaugural Academic Conference.HSS J. 2024 Nov;20(4):616-623. doi: 10.1177/15563316241242368. Epub 2024 Apr 5. HSS J. 2024. PMID: 39494423 No abstract available.
-
The influence of age on cellular senescence in injured versus healthy muscle and its implications on rotator cuff injuries.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jun;34(6S):S117-S126. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Mar 7. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. PMID: 40057173
-
Subscapularis Management With Biologic Augmentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Apr 16;13(5):102953. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102953. eCollection 2024 May. Arthrosc Tech. 2024. PMID: 38835446 Free PMC article.
-
Biological strategies in rotator cuff repair: a clinical application and molecular background.EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Dec 2;9(12):1156-1169. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0012. EFORT Open Rev. 2024. PMID: 39620574 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical