Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 22:11:e42023.
doi: 10.2196/42023.

Community Health Worker Use of Smart Devices for Health Promotion: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Community Health Worker Use of Smart Devices for Health Promotion: Scoping Review

Merlin Greuel et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Community health workers (CHWs) have become essential to the promotion of healthy behaviors, yet their work is complicated by challenges both within and beyond their control. These challenges include resistance to the change of existing behaviors, disbelief of health messages, limited community health literacy, insufficient CHW communication skills and knowledge, lack of community interest and respect for CHWs, and CHWs' lack of adequate supplies. The rising penetration of "smart" technology (eg, smartphones and tablets) in low- and middle-income countries facilitates the use of portable electronic devices in the field.

Objective: This scoping review examines to what extent mobile health in the form of smart devices may enhance the delivery of public health messages in CHW-client interactions, thereby addressing the aforementioned challenges and inducing client behavior change.

Methods: We conducted a structured search of the PubMed and LILACS databases using subject heading terms in 4 categories: technology user, technology device, use of technology, and outcome. Eligibility criteria included publication since January 2007, CHWs delivering a health message aided by a smart device, and face-to-face communication between CHWs and clients. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively using a modified version of the Partners in Health conceptual framework.

Results: We identified 12 eligible studies, 10 (83%) of which used qualitative or mixed methods approaches. We found that smart devices mitigate challenges encountered by CHWs by improving their knowledge, motivation, and creativity (eg, through self-made videos); their status within the community; and the credibility of their health messages. The technology stimulated interest in both CHWs and clients-and sometimes even in bystanders and neighbors. Media content produced locally or reflecting local customs was strongly embraced. Yet, the effect of smart devices on the quality of CHW-client interactions was inconclusive. Interactions suffered as CHWs were tempted to replace educational conversations with clients by passively watching video content. Furthermore, a series of technical difficulties experienced especially by older and less educated CHWs compromised some of the advantages brought about by mobile devices. Adequate CHW training ameliorated these difficulties. Only 1 study (8%) considered client health behavior change as an end point, thus revealing a major research gap.

Conclusions: Smart mobile devices may augment CHWs' field performance and enhance face-to-face interactions with clients, yet they also generate new challenges. The available evidence is scarce, mostly qualitative, and focused on a limited range of health outcomes. Future research should include larger-scale interventions across a wide range of health outcomes and feature client health behavior change as an end point.

Keywords: community health workers; health behaviour; health message; health outcome; health promotion; health worker; mobile health; public health; smart devices; smart phones; smart technology; tablets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework of facilitators and barriers to community health workers (CHWs) and patients acting as partners in health. Challenges to the CHW-client interaction are shown in red (adapted from Katigbak et al [3] with permission from the American Journal of Public Health).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) flow diagram for review articles. Reasons for exclusion do not sum to total because some categories overlap. CHW: community health worker.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Smart devices as catalysts for community health promotion.

References

    1. Perry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM. Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014 Mar;35:399–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tulenko K, Møgedal S, Afzal MM, Frymus D, Oshin A, Pate M, Quain E, Pinel A, Wynd S, Zodpey S. Community health workers for universal health-care coverage: from fragmentation to synergy. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 01;91(11):847–852. doi: 10.2471/blt.13.118745. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katigbak C, Van Devanter N, Islam N, Trinh-Shevrin C. Partners in health: a conceptual framework for the role of community health workers in facilitating patients' adoption of healthy behaviors. Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):872–880. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302411. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;57(1):1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x. - DOI
    1. Bouton ME. Why behavior change is difficult to sustain. Prev Med. 2014 Nov;68:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.010. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24937649 S0091-7435(14)00210-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types