Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 36812500
- PMCID: PMC10595457
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1831CI
Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Resuscitation is a cornerstone of management. This review covers five areas of evolving practice in the management of early sepsis-induced hypoperfusion: fluid resuscitation volume, timing of vasopressor initiation, resuscitation targets, route of vasopressor administration, and use of invasive blood pressure monitoring. For each topic, we review the seminal evidence, discuss the evolution of practice over time, and highlight questions for additional research. Intravenous fluids are a core component of early sepsis resuscitation. However, with growing concerns about the harms of fluid, practice is evolving toward smaller-volume resuscitation, which is often paired with earlier vasopressor initiation. Large trials of fluid-restrictive, vasopressor-early strategies are providing more information about the safety and potential benefit of these approaches. Lowering blood pressure targets is a means to prevent fluid overload and reduce exposure to vasopressors; mean arterial pressure targets of 60-65 mm Hg appear to be safe, at least in older patients. With the trend toward earlier vasopressor initiation, the need for central administration of vasopressors has been questioned, and peripheral vasopressor use is increasing, although it is not universally accepted. Similarly, although guidelines suggest the use of invasive blood pressure monitoring with arterial catheters in patients receiving vasopressors, blood pressure cuffs are less invasive and often sufficient. Overall, the management of early sepsis-induced hypoperfusion is evolving toward fluid-sparing and less-invasive strategies. However, many questions remain, and additional data are needed to further optimize our approach to resuscitation.
Keywords: fluid therapy; hypotension; sepsis; septic shock; vasoconstrictor agents.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The initial resuscitation of septic shock.J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 11. J Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32135409 Review.
-
Should Vasopressors Be Started Early in Septic Shock?Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):683-688. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733897. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34544185 Review.
-
Delayed vasopressor initiation is associated with increased mortality in patients with septic shock.J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 9. J Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 31731173
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23361625 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of an Early Resuscitation Protocol on In-hospital Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis and Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1233-1240. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.10913. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28973227 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Hemoperfusion with Seraph-100 in septic patients removes pathogens and improves clinical outcomes.Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01280-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40399373 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding How Clinicians Personalize Fluid and Vasopressor Decisions in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247480. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7480. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38639934 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy of various resuscitation fluids in the management of sepsis in postoperative surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review and meta--analysis.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Sep 20;19(3):275-288. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17900. eCollection 2024 Oct 16. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024. PMID: 40041106 Free PMC article.
-
Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):474-482. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38436976 Free PMC article.
-
Restrictive fluid resuscitation versus liberal fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock: comparison of outcomes.Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2311-2321. doi: 10.62347/PGBB6148. eCollection 2025. Am J Transl Res. 2025. PMID: 40225983 Free PMC article.
References
-
- De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Scolletta S, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome. Crit Care Med . 2013;41:791–799. - PubMed
-
- Hinshaw LB. Sepsis/septic shock: participation of the microcirculation: an abbreviated review. Crit Care Med . 1996;24:1072–1078. - PubMed
-
- De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2002;166:98–104. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical