Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;2(2):e0000106.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000106. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Automated large-scale prediction of exudative AMD progression using machine-read OCT biomarkers

Affiliations

Automated large-scale prediction of exudative AMD progression using machine-read OCT biomarkers

Akos Rudas et al. PLOS Digit Health. .

Abstract

Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of irreversible vision loss in individuals over 55 years old in the United States. One of the late-stage manifestations of AMD, and a major cause of vision loss, is the development of exudative macular neovascularization (MNV). Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is the gold standard to identify fluid at different levels within the retina. The presence of fluid is considered the hallmark to define the presence of disease activity. Anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections can be used to treat exudative MNV. However, given the limitations of anti-VEGF treatment, as burdensome need for frequent visits and repeated injections to sustain efficacy, limited durability of the treatment, poor or no response, there is a great interest in detecting early biomarkers associated with a higher risk for AMD progression to exudative forms in order to optimize the design of early intervention clinical trials. The annotation of structural biomarkers on optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans is a laborious, complex and time-consuming process, and discrepancies between human graders can introduce variability into this assessment. To address this issue, a deep-learning model (SLIVER-net) was proposed, which could identify AMD biomarkers on structural OCT volumes with high precision and without human supervision. However, the validation was performed on a small dataset, and the true predictive power of these detected biomarkers in the context of a large cohort has not been evaluated. In this retrospective cohort study, we perform the largest-scale validation of these biomarkers to date. We also assess how these features combined with other EHR data (demographics, comorbidities, etc) affect and/or improve the prediction performance relative to known factors. Our hypothesis is that these biomarkers can be identified by a machine learning algorithm without human supervision, in a way that they preserve their predictive nature. The way we test this hypothesis is by building several machine learning models utilizing these machine-read biomarkers and assessing their added predictive power. We found that not only can we show that the machine-read OCT B-scan biomarkers are predictive of AMD progression, we also observe that our proposed combined OCT and EHR data-based algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art solution in clinically relevant metrics and provides actionable information which has the potential to improve patient care. In addition, it provides a framework for automated large-scale processing of OCT volumes, making it possible to analyze vast archives without human supervision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Eran Halperin has received consulting fees from United Health Group. SriniVas Sadda has received consulting fees from Amgen, Allergan, Genentech-Roche, Oxurion, Novartis, Regeneron, Iveric, 4DMT, Centervue, Heidelberg, Optos, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Nidek, and Topcon.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Exudative AMD prediction performance.
Left: Areas Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Right: Areas Under the Precision-Recall (PR) curve. Each bar represents the performance utilizing a different set of features (see legend). Error lines represent the 95% confidence intervals, computed using bootstrapping.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Prediction of exudative AMD Conversion by the 2-year model, evaluated at different time frames.
Left. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) as a function of prediction time frame. Right. Area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) as a function of prediction time frame. 95% Confidence intervals were computed using bootstrapping.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Model weights for all features in the fitted combined model.
Black error bars indicate standard deviation of values obtained by fitting the model to bootstrapped subsets of the cohort.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Automated diagnosis of exudative AMD. Curves correspond to models trained on different feature sets (see legend).
Left. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC). Right. Precision-Recall curve (PRC). 95% Confidence intervals were computed using bootstrapping. Baseline model utilizes EHR-derived features and risk factors, the biomarker model includes machine-read OCT biomarkers too.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, et al.. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106–16. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonas JB, Cheung CMG, Panda-Jonas S. Updates on the Epidemiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(6):493–7. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017251 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferris FL, Wilkinson CP, Bird A, Chakravarthy U, Chew E, Csaky K, et al.. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(4):844–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spaide RF, Jaffe GJ, Sarraf D, Freund KB, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G, et al.. Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(5):616–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadda SR, Guymer R, Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Curcio CA, Bird AC, et al.. Consensus Definition for Atrophy Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration on OCT: Classification of Atrophy Report 3. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(4):537–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed