Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis
- PMID: 36814030
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09447-w
Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis
Abstract
Objectives: This study was carried out to investigate a new device for axial loading MRI (alMRI) in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Methods: A total of 87 patients with suspected LSS sequentially underwent conventional MRI and alMRI using a new device with pneumatic shoulder-hip compression mode. Four quantitative parameters of dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA), sagittal vertebral canal diameter (SVCD), disc height (DH), and ligamentum flavum thickness (LFT) at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 in both examinations were measured and compared. Eight qualitative indicators were compared as valuable diagnostic information. Image quality, examinee comfort, test-retest repeatability, and observer reliability were also assessed.
Results: Using the new device, all 87 patients successfully completed alMRI with no statistically significant differences in image quality and examinee comfort from conventional MRI. Statistically significant changes were observed in DSCA, SVCD, DH, and LFT after loading (p < 0.01). SVCD, DH, LFT, and DSCA changes were all positively correlated (r = 0.80, 0.72, 0.37, p < 0.01). Eight qualitative indicators increased from 501 to 669 after axial loading, for a total increase of 168 (33.5%). Nineteen patients (21.8%, 19/87) developed absolute stenosis after axial loading and 10 of them (11.5%, 10/87) also had a significant reduction in DSCA (> 15 mm2). The test-retest repeatability and observer reliability were good to excellent.
Conclusion: The new device is stable for performing alMRI and can exacerbate the severity of spinal stenosis, providing more valuable information for diagnosing LSS and reducing missed diagnoses.
Key points: • The new axial loading MRI (alMRI) device could detect a higher frequency of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). • The new device with pneumatic shoulder-hip compression mode was used to investigate its applicability in alMRI and diagnostic value for LSS. • The new device is stable for performing alMRI and can provide more valuable information for diagnosing LSS.
Keywords: Equipment and supplies; Lumbosacral region; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal stenosis; Weight-bearing.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Comment in
-
Weight-bearing MRI for dynamic evaluations of spinal and neural foraminal stenosis.Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):4780-4781. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09737-3. Epub 2023 May 22. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37212847 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device.Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Feb;54(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04720-5. Epub 2024 Jun 7. Skeletal Radiol. 2025. PMID: 38849534
-
Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e69-e75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.091. Epub 2019 Mar 9. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30857995
-
Axial loading lumbar magnetic resonance imaging with a new device in asymptomatic individuals.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):58-65. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-283. Epub 2022 Sep 22. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 36620162 Free PMC article.
-
Test-retest repeatability of lumbar sagittal alignment and disc height measurements with or without axial loading: a computed tomography study.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Apr;24(2):93-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181dd611f. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011. PMID: 21430497
-
Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 May 15;50(10):E179-E196. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005174. Epub 2024 Oct 11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025. PMID: 39451133
Cited by
-
Weight-bearing MRI for dynamic evaluations of spinal and neural foraminal stenosis.Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):4780-4781. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09737-3. Epub 2023 May 22. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37212847 No abstract available.
-
Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2234-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08251-4. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38587545 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device.Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Feb;54(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04720-5. Epub 2024 Jun 7. Skeletal Radiol. 2025. PMID: 38849534
References
-
- Rainville J, Lopez E (2013) Comparison of radicular symptoms caused by lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1282–1287
-
- de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P et al (2013) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(8):E469-81
-
- de Graaf I, Prak A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Thomas S, Peul W, Koes B (2006) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(10):1168–76
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical