Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;48(1):65-71.
doi: 10.1002/jppr.1349. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Outcomes of a pharmacist-managed clinic for underserved persons with unmanaged type 2 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Outcomes of a pharmacist-managed clinic for underserved persons with unmanaged type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ashley L Lefebvre et al. J Pharm Pract Res. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Aim: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist intervention on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and diabetes-related hospitalisations in an underserved cohort with unmanaged type 2 DM.

Methods: This analysis was a retrospective cohort study. Criteria for inclusion were persons with unmanaged type 2 DM defined as HbA1c values ≥8% at time of enrolment, ≥18 years old, and enrolment in a pharmacist-managed clinic for ≥12 months. Pre- and post-intervention differences in HbA1c, SBP and DBP values were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The risk of diabetes-related hospitalisations was estimated during the 12 months prior and during the 12 months post-intervention, and the relative risk (RR) was calculated.

Results: Mean HbA1c values at 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention were lower than baseline values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in mean HbA1c values at 6 or 12 months compared to 3 months post intervention. Mean SBP values at 3, 6 and 12 months were lower than baseline (p < 0.05). Likewise, mean DBP values at 6 and 12 months were lower than baseline (p < 0.05). The estimated RR of diabetes-related hospitalisations was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.20-0.83; p = 0.013).

Conclusion: Enrolment in a pharmacist-managed diabetes program was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c, SBP and DBP and reduction in risk of diabetes-related hospitalisations in an underserved cohort of patients with diabetes over a 12-month period.

Keywords: ambulatory care; diabetes mellitus; indigent care; pharmacist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests statement The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process flowchart of the multidisciplinary coordinated care model for persons with treatment-resistant/unmanaged type 2 diabetes. eMR = Electronic Medical Record, DM = diabetes mellitus. Certified pharmacists conduct medication therapy management (MTM), disease state education, administer immunisations and recommend preventive care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Trend of mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values (± standard deviation) prior to and following enrolment in the pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic (n = 60). *Indicates that mean HbA1c values at 3, 6 and 12 months following enrolment in the pharmacist-run program were significantly lower than baseline values (p < 0.05). (B) Change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values from previous recorded values following enrolment in the pharmacist-run medical clinic. Data is presented as mean change with 95% confidence intervals (CI). *Indicates that the reduction in HbA1c at 3 months following enrolment is significantly different from 0 (p < 0.05). The change in mean HbA1c values at 6 months from corresponding values at 3 months was not different from 0. Similarly, the change in mean HbA1c values at 12 months from corresponding values at 6 months was not different from 0. (C) Impact of pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values of newly admitted treatment-resistant persons with Type II diabetes (n = 46) at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months following admission. Bar represents mean change in BP compared to baseline values and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI). *Significantly different from 0 (p < 0.05).

References

    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387(10027): 1513–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
    1. Stolar M Glycemic control and complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2010; 123(3 Suppl.): S3–11. - PubMed
    1. Gastor B, Hirsch IB. The effects of improved glycemic control on complications in type 2 diabetes. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(2): 134–40. - PubMed
    1. Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127(9): 788–95. - PubMed