Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;7(2):672-683.
doi: 10.31031/acam.2022.07.000660. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Reliability of a Wearable Motion System for Clinical Evaluation of Dynamic Lumbar Spine Function

Hamed Hani  1   2 , Reid Souchereau  1   2 , Anas Kachlan  1   2 , Halle Harris  1   2 , Jonathan Dufour  1   2 , Alexander Aurand  1   2 , Prasath Mageswaran  1   2 , Madison Hyer  3 , William Marras  1   2
Affiliations

Reliability of a Wearable Motion System for Clinical Evaluation of Dynamic Lumbar Spine Function

Hamed Hani et al. Adv Complement Altern Med. 2022.

Abstract

Background: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Subjective assessments are often used to assess extent of functional limitations and treatment response. However, these measures have poor sensitivity and are influenced by the patient's perception of their condition. Currently, there are no objective tools to effectively assess the extent of an individual's functional disability and inform clinical decision-making.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a wearable motion system based on Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors for use in quantifying low back function.

Methods: Low back motion assessments were conducted by 3 novice raters on 20 participants using an IMU-based motion system. These assessments were conducted over 3 days with 2 days of rest in between tests. A total of 37 kinematic parameters were extracted from the low back motion assessment in all three anatomical planes. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) calculated from repeated measures, mixed-effects regression models.

Results: Lumbar spine-specific kinematic parameters showed moderate to excellent reliability across all kinematic parameters. The ICC values ranged between 0.84-0.93 for intra-rater reliability and 0.66 - 0.83 for inter-rater reliability. In particular, velocity measures showed higher reliabilities than other kinematic variables.

Conclusion: The IMU-based wearable motion system is a valid and reliable tool to objectively assess low back function. This study demonstrated that lumbar spine-specific kinematic metrics have the potential to provide good, repeatable metrics to assess clinical function over time.

Keywords: Inter-rater; Intra-rater; Low back disorder; Lumbar function; Reliability; Wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
IMU sensor configuration for Lumbar Spine Motion Assessment
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Inter- versus intra-rater reliability in the axial plane. Poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability regions are displayed in red, yellow, light green, and dark green colors, respectively. Positional, velocity-related, and acceleration-related measures are shown with circles, triangles, and squares.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Inter- versus intra-rater reliability in the lateral plane. Poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability regions are displayed in red, yellow, light green, and dark green colors, respectively. Positional, velocity-related, and acceleration-related measures are shown with circles, triangles, and squares.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Inter- versus intra-rater reliability in the sagittal plane. Poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability regions are displayed in red, yellow, light green, and dark green colors, respectively. Positional, velocity-related, and acceleration-related measures are shown with circles, triangles, and squares.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Illustration of performing each motion.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Illustration of performing each motion.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Illustration of performing each motion.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Illustration of performing each motion.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Illustration of performing each motion.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Lateral motion data collected with device.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Lateral motion data collected with device.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, Lauren T, Peter A, et al. (2019) Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23(3): 23. - PubMed
    1. Dutmer AL, Schiphorst PHR, Soer R, Sandra B, Ute B, et al. (2019) Personal and societal impact of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(24): E1443–E1451. - PubMed
    1. Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Jinfeng H, Xiangyang W, et al. (2020) Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: Estimates from the global burden of disease study 2017. Ann Transl Med 8(6): 299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhowimel A, AlOtaibi M, Radford K, Coulson N (2018) Psychosocial factors associated with change in pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated by physiotherapist: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med 6: 2050312118757387. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mannion AF, Balagué F, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(11): 610–618. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources