Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 3:57:101839.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101839. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Adjuvant icotinib versus observation in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC (GASTO1003, CORIN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Affiliations

Adjuvant icotinib versus observation in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC (GASTO1003, CORIN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Wei Ou et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: This phase 2 trial aimed to compare adjuvant icotinib with observation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We performed a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial from May 1, 2015 to December 29, 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China. Patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutant, stage IB (the 7th edition of TNM staging) NSCLC without adjuvant chemotherapy were randomised (1:1) to receive adjuvant therapy with icotinib (125 mg, three times daily) for 12 months or to undergo observation until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). CORIN (GASTO1003) was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, with the number NCT02264210.

Findings: A total of 128 patients were randomised, with 63 patients in the icotinib group and 65 patients in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months. The three-year DFS was significantly higher in the icotinib group (96.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3-99.9) than in the observation group (84.0%, 95% CI, 75.1-92.9; P = 0.041). The DFS was significantly longer in the icotinib group than in the observation group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P = 0.013). The OS data were immature, with three deaths in the observation arm. In the icotinib group, adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 49 patients (77.8%), and grade 3 or greater AEs occurred in four patients (6.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation: Our findings suggested that adjuvant icotinib improved the 3-year DFS in patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated stage IB NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

Funding: This study was sponsored by Betta Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Keywords: Adjuvant therapy; Icotinib; Stage IB NSCLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LMD and ZLS are employees of Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. TW and YP are employees of Hangzhou Repugene Technology Co., Ltd. Other co-authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study profile. Data cutoff on July 30, 2022. N, number; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves for disease-free survival in the overall population based on (A) 7th edition of TNM staging system and (B) 8th edition of TNM staging system. DMS, disease-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subgroup analyses of disease-free survival with respect to baseline characteristics. N, number; DFS, disease-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier curves for central nervous system (CNS) disease-free survival in the overall population based on (A) 7th edition of TNM staging system and (B) 8th edition of TNM staging system.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
    1. Howlader N., Forjaz G., Mooradian M.J., et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(7):640–649. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Datta D., Lahiri B. Preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Chest. 2003;123(6):2096–2103. - PubMed
    1. Le Chevalier T. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: where is it going? Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii196–v198. - PubMed
    1. Pignon J.P., Tribodet H., Scagliotti G.V., et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3552–3559. - PubMed

Associated data