Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 2:11:1073552.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552. eCollection 2023.

Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas

Junxu Zhou  1 , Rong Peng  1   2 , Yajun Chang  1 , Zijun Liu  3 , Songhui Gao  1 , Chuanjun Zhao  1 , Yixin Li  1 , Qiming Feng  2 , Xianjing Qin  2
Affiliations

Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas

Junxu Zhou et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especially encountering the challenge of the COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the trend of the primary health service efficiency in the past decade, compare the urban-rural differences, and explore relevant factors.

Methods: DEA and Malmquist models were applied to calculate the health service efficiency of PHCIs among 28 provinces in China, with the input variables including the number of institutions, number of beds, number of health technicians, and the outputs variables including the number of outpatients and emergency visits, number of discharged patients. And the Tobit model was used to analyze the factors on the efficiency in urban and rural. A sensitivity analysis for model validations was also carried out.

Results: The average technical efficiency (TE) of urban PHCIs fluctuated from 63.3% to 67.1%, which was lower than that in rural (75.8-82.2%) from 2009 to 2019. In terms of dynamic efficiency, the urban PHCIs performed better than the rural, and the trends in the total factor productivity change were associated with favorable technology advancement. The population density and dependency ratio were the key factors on TE in both of the urban and rural PHCIs, and these two factors were positively correlated to TE. In terms of TE, it was negatively correlated with the proportion of total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in urban PHCIs, while in rural it was positively correlated with the urbanization rate and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Besides, the tests of Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis H indicated the internal validity and robustness of the chosen DEA and Malmquist models.

Conclusions: It needs to reduce the health resource wastes and increase service provision in urban PHCIs. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strengthen medical technology and gaining greater efficiency in rural PHCIs by technology renovation.

Keywords: China; Malmquist index; data envelopment analysis; primary healthcare institutions; relative efficiency; urban-rural areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The DEA analysis for PHCIs, 2009–2019.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization . The Declaration of Alma-Ata on Primary Health Care. (1978). Available online at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/39228/1/9241800011 [accessed July 15, 2022].
    1. Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. (1994) 344:1129–33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90634-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Starfield B, Shi LY, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. (2005) 83:457–502. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jin H, Wang ZX, Shi LY, Chen C, Huo YH, Huang WQ, et al. . Multimorbid patient experiences with primary care at community health centers in Shanghai, China. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:606188. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.606188 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaglehole R, Epping-Jordan J, Patel V, Chopra M, Ebrahim S, et al. . Improving the prevention and management of chronic disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a priority for primary health care. Lancet. (2008) 372:940–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61404-X - DOI - PubMed

Publication types