Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 9;27(1):23-83.
doi: 10.29337/ijsp.183. eCollection 2023.

Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study

Affiliations

Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study

Giovanni E Cacciamani et al. Int J Surg Protoc. .

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) occur and have the potential to impact the postoperative course. However, iAEs are underreported and are not routinely collected in the contemporary surgical literature. There is no widely utilized system for the collection of essential aspects of iAEs, and there is no established database for the standardization and dissemination of this data that likely have implications for outcomes and patient safety. The Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration initiated a global effort to address these shortcomings, and the establishment of an adverse event data collection system is an essential step. In this study, we present the core-set variables for collecting iAEs that were based on the globally validated ICARUS criteria for surgical/interventional and anesthesiologic intraoperative adverse event collection and reporting.

Material and methods: This article includes three tools to capture the essential aspects of iAEs. The core-set variables were developed from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting iAEs (item 1). Next, the summary table was developed to guide researchers in summarizing the accumulated iAE data in item 1 (item 2). Finally, this article includes examples of the method and results sections to include in a manuscript reporting iAE data (item 3). Then, 5 scenarios demonstrating best practices for completing items 1-3 were presented both in prose and in a video produced by the ICARUS collaboration.

Dissemination: This article provides the surgical community with the tools for collecting essential iAE data. The ICARUS collaboration has already published the 13 criteria for reporting surgical adverse events, but this article is unique and essential as it actually provides the tools for iAE collection. The study team plans to collect feedback for future directions of adverse event collection and reporting.

Highlights: This article represents a novel, fully-encompassing system for the data collection of intraoperative adverse events.The presented core-set variables for reporting intraoperative adverse events are not based solely on our opinion, but rather are synthesized from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting intraoperative adverse events.Together, the included text, figures, and ICARUS collaboration-produced video should equip any surgeon, anesthesiologist, or nurse with the tools to properly collect intraoperative adverse event data.Future directions include translation of this article to allow for the widest possible adoption of this important collection system.

Keywords: core set variables; database; intraoperative adverse event; intraoperative complications; patient data; protocol development; variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Intraoperative adverse event core set variables development and explanation
Figure 1
Intraoperative adverse event core set variables development and explanation.
Scenario #1
Figure 2
Scenario n.1: No Intraoperative Adverse Events Occurred. iAEs: Intraoperative Adverse Events; Post-op: Post-operative; n/a: Not applicable.
Scenario #2
Figure 3
Scenario n.2: One Intraoperative Adverse Event in One Patient. iAEs: Intraoperative Adverse Events; Post-op: Post-operative; Not applicable.
Scenario #3
Figure 4
Scenario n.3: Multiple Intraoperative Adverse Events in One Patient. iAEs: Intraoperative Adverse Events; Post-op: Post-operative; n/a: Not applicable.
Scenario #4
Figure 5
Scenario n.4: One Intraoperative Adverse Event in Different Patients. iAEs: Intraoperative Adverse Events; Post-op: Post-operative; n/a: Not applicable.
Scenario #5
Figure 6
Scenario n.5: Multiple Intraoperative Adverse Events in Different Patients. iAEs: Intraoperative Adverse Events; Post-op: Post-operative; n/a: Not applicable.

References

    1. Kaafarani HM, et al. Derivation and validation of a novel severity classification for intraoperative adverse events. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014; 218(6): 1120–1128. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohnen JD, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Annals of surgery. 2017; 265(6): 1119–1125. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001906 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cacciamani GE, et al. Standardizing The Intraoperative Adverse Events Assessment to Create a Positive Culture of Reporting Errors in Surgery and Anesthesiology. Annals of Surgery. 2022. 276(2): e75–e76. - PubMed
    1. Cacciamani G, et al. Assessing, grading, and reporting intraoperative adverse events during and after surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2021. - PubMed
    1. Eppler M, et al. If You Know Them, You Avoid Them: The Imperative Need to Improve the Narrative Regarding Perioperative Adverse Events. MDPI. 2022; 4978. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11174978 - DOI - PMC - PubMed