ChatGPT Output Regarding Compulsory Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy: A Descriptive Study at the Outset of a Paradigm Shift in Online Search for Information
- PMID: 36819954
- PMCID: PMC9931398
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35029
ChatGPT Output Regarding Compulsory Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy: A Descriptive Study at the Outset of a Paradigm Shift in Online Search for Information
Abstract
Background: Being on the verge of a revolutionary approach to gathering information, ChatGPT (an artificial intelligence (AI)-based language model developed by OpenAI, and capable of producing human-like text) could be the prime motive of a paradigm shift on how humans will acquire information. Despite the concerns related to the use of such a promising tool in relation to the future of the quality of education, this technology will soon be incorporated into web search engines mandating the need to evaluate the output of such a tool. Previous studies showed that dependence on some sources of online information (e.g., social media platforms) was associated with higher rates of vaccination hesitancy. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to describe the output of ChatGPT regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine conspiracy beliefs. and compulsory vaccination.
Methods: The current descriptive study was conducted on January 14, 2023 using the ChatGPT from OpenAI (OpenAI, L.L.C., San Francisco, CA, USA). The output was evaluated by two authors and the degree of agreement regarding the correctness, clarity, conciseness, and bias was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.
Results: The ChatGPT responses were dismissive of conspiratorial ideas about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) origins labeling it as non-credible and lacking scientific evidence. Additionally, ChatGPT responses were totally against COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy statements. Regarding compulsory vaccination, ChatGPT responses were neutral citing the following as advantages of this strategy: protecting public health, maintaining herd immunity, reducing the spread of disease, cost-effectiveness, and legal obligation, and on the other hand, it cited the following as disadvantages of compulsory vaccination: ethical and legal concerns, mistrust and resistance, logistical challenges, and limited resources and knowledge.
Conclusions: The current study showed that ChatGPT could be a source of information to challenge COVID-19 vaccine conspiracies. For compulsory vaccination, ChatGPT resonated with the divided opinion in the scientific community toward such a strategy; nevertheless, it detailed the pros and cons of this approach. As it currently stands, the judicious use of ChatGPT could be utilized as a user-friendly source of COVID-19 vaccine information that could challenge conspiracy ideas with clear, concise, and non-biased content. However, ChatGPT content cannot be used as an alternative to the original reliable sources of vaccine information (e.g., the World Health Organization [WHO] and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]).
Keywords: artificial intelligence in medicine; covid-19 vaccine; machine learning; mandatory vaccination; vaccine promotion.
Copyright © 2023, Sallam et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Is ChatGPT an Accurate and Reliable Source of Information for Patients with Vaccine and Statin Hesitancy?Medeni Med J. 2024 Mar 21;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.03154. Medeni Med J. 2024. PMID: 38511678 Free PMC article.
-
Low COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Is Correlated with Conspiracy Beliefs among University Students in Jordan.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052407. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33804558 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study.JMIR AI. 2024 Jan 22;3:e49082. doi: 10.2196/49082. JMIR AI. 2024. PMID: 38875597 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing vaccine hesitancy and resistance for COVID-19 vaccines.Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jul;131:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104241. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022. PMID: 35489108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations.Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 4;6:1169595. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169595. eCollection 2023. Front Artif Intell. 2023. PMID: 37215063 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bibliometric top ten healthcare-related ChatGPT publications in the first ChatGPT anniversary.Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e917. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.917. Epub 2024 Aug 5. Narra J. 2024. PMID: 39280327 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: Evaluating ChatGPT Responses to Vaccination Myths and Misconceptions.Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jul 7;11(7):1217. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11071217. Vaccines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37515033 Free PMC article.
-
Ensuring Accuracy and Equity in Vaccination Information From ChatGPT and CDC: Mixed-Methods Cross-Language Evaluation.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 30;8:e60939. doi: 10.2196/60939. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39476380 Free PMC article.
-
Heart-to-heart with ChatGPT: the impact of patients consulting AI for cardiovascular health advice.Open Heart. 2023 Nov;10(2):e002455. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002455. Open Heart. 2023. PMID: 37945282 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medicine and Pharmacy Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice regarding Artificial Intelligence Programs: Jordan and West Bank of Palestine.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Dec 13;14:1391-1400. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S433255. eCollection 2023. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023. PMID: 38106923 Free PMC article.
References
-
- OpenAI: Models GPT-3. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2023. https://beta.openai.com/docs/models https://beta.openai.com/docs/models
-
- Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers? [PREPRINT] Castelvecchi D. Nature. 2022 - PubMed
-
- ChatGPT. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2022. https://chat.openai.com/chat https://chat.openai.com/chat
-
- Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Else H. Nature. 2023;613:423. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous