Low-Volume Home Haemodialysis and In-Centre Haemodialysis: Comparison of Dialysis Adequacy in Obese Individuals
- PMID: 36819955
- PMCID: PMC9937637
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35054
Low-Volume Home Haemodialysis and In-Centre Haemodialysis: Comparison of Dialysis Adequacy in Obese Individuals
Abstract
Background Although frequent low-flow, low-volume haemodialysis using the NxStage System One is now well-established as an option for home therapy of end-stage chronic kidney disease, its ability to deliver adequate dialysis in people with high BMI remains questionable. This doubt may lead to obese individuals being denied the potential benefits of this modality. To establish if this doubt is justified, we compared dialysis adequacy in two groups of obese individuals; one receiving standard thrice-weekly in-centre haemodialysis and the other receiving frequent haemodialysis at home using the NxStage System One. Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 105 adult dialysis patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). All had been on dialysis for at least six months. Fifty-five patients receiving in-centre haemodialysis were compared with 50 patients receiving home haemodialysis using NxStage System One. Dialysis adequacy (standard Kt/V calculated by the Daugirdas equation) was compared between the two groups. The clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, and treatment regimens of each group were also compared. Results The in-centre haemodialysis group was older (63.6 ± 12.8 years vs. 58.5 ± 10.9 years, p=0.033) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity score (5.9 ± 2.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.5, p=0.003). Standard Kt/V was significantly higher in the home haemodialysis group (2.4 ± 0.5) than in the in-centre haemodialysis group (2.2 ± 0.2) (p = 0.006). The mean serum inorganic phosphate was significantly lower in the home haemodialysis group than in the in-centre haemodialysis group (1.6 ± 0.4 mmol/l vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mmol/l, p = 0.010). There were no statistically significant differences in the usage of antihypertensives, phosphate binders, or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents between the two groups. Conclusions In this study, dialysis adequacy (expressed as standard Kt/V) was superior to that of standard thrice-weekly in-center haemodialysis delivered by frequent low-volume home haemodialysis using the NxStage System One. Hesitancy about recommending frequent low-volume home haemodialysis to obese individuals is therefore unjustified.
Keywords: comorbid obesity; haemodialysis (hd); home haemodialysis (hhd); in-centre haemodialysis; nxstage system one.
Copyright © 2023, Alalwan et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Figures
References
-
- Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, et al. Lancet. 2015;385:1975–1982. - PubMed
-
- Impact of obesity on dialysis and transplant and its management. Diwan TS, Cuffy MC, Linares-Cervantes I, Govil A. Semin Dial. 2020;33:279–285. - PubMed
-
- Home hemodialysis: survival, quality of life, and rehabilitation. Oberley ET, Schatell DR. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1996;3:147–153. - PubMed
-
- Home hemodialysis: excellent survival at less cost, but still underutilized. McGregor DO, Buttimore AL, Lynn KL. Kidney Int. 2000;57:2654–2655. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources