Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 14:17:583-590.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S382502. eCollection 2023.

Incidence, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Management of Positive Vitreous Pressure During Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Incidence, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Management of Positive Vitreous Pressure During Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Literature Review

Majed Alkharashi et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Positive vitreous pressure (PVP) is common during open anterior segment surgery and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has a reported incidence rate of 40-50%. Despite adequate perioperative preventive precautions, positive pressure occurs during surgery and optimum management of PVP is required to avoid serious complications. Many pharmacological and mechanical approaches can be employed either preoperatively or intraoperatively to decrease vitreous pressure. Surgical techniques such as graft-over-host technique, the modified graft-over-host technique, techniques employed mattress sutures and needle, or Vitreous aspiration or vitrectomy can be effectively used to manage intraoperative PVP during PPK. This article reviews the incidence, risk factors, prevention, and different approaches to the management of positive vitreous pressure during PKP to analyze the available evidence in order to improve the safety profile of PKP and prevent sight-threatening complications.

Keywords: complications; management; penetrating keratoplasty; positive vitreous pressure; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative photo demonstrated that the intraocular lens can be held back in position by passing a straight long needle of the 10–0 Prolene suture (STC, Ethicon) across the anterior chamber. (Image courtesy; from Majed Alkharashi).

References

    1. Dekaris I, Gabric N, Pauk M, Drača N. Positive pressure during penetrating keratoplasty can be solved with a modified graft-over-host technique. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(3):282–285. doi:10.1111/AOS.12085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan DTH, Dart JKG, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1749–1761. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60437-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCartney DL, Gottsch JD, Stark WJ. Managing posterior pressure during pseudophakic keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(9):1384. doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020454054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loden JC, Price J. Price graft-over-host technique to manage positive pressure during penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(6):736–738. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80123-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gross RH, Shaw EL. Management of increased vitreous pressure during penetrating keratoplasty using pars plana anterior vitreous aspiration: author’s reply. Cornea. 2002;21(4):435–436. doi:10.1097/00003226-200205000-00027 - DOI - PubMed