Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;33(8):5653-5663.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09495-2. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

Who publishes imaging articles in non-imaging journals? A large sample data-mining study

Affiliations

Who publishes imaging articles in non-imaging journals? A large sample data-mining study

Augustin Gaudemer et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the weight of imaging and imaging specialists (i.e., affiliated to a radiology/nuclear medicine department) in publications in non-imaging journals.

Methods: All articles indexed in English on the Embase database between 1989 and 2019 were extracted. The number and affiliation of authors were determined. A naive Bayesian classifier algorithm was trained to classify abstracts as "imaging" or "non-imaging." The main outcome was the number and position of imaging specialists in the authorship of imaging articles published in non-imaging journals. Analyses per medical specialties and per journal impact factor (IF) were performed.

Results: A total of 15,787,825 articles were included with 968,259 (6%) "imaging" articles. The proportion of imaging articles increased over time (+ 370%), quicker than the overall academic output. The proportion of imaging specialist among authors grew from 0.58% in 1989-1994 to 1.54% in 2015-2019. About 20% of imaging articles had ≥ 1 imaging specialist among authors. The proportion of imaging articles decreased with the IF (7.3% for IF 0-2.5 vs. 5.1% for IF > 10, p < 0.001), but the proportion of imaging specialist authors in imaging papers with ≥ 1 imaging specialist author increased with the IF (40% for IF 0-2.5, 53% for IF > 10, p < 0.001). There was significant variability across medical specialties.

Conclusions: The weight of imaging articles and imaging specialist among authors in non-imaging journals has increased over time but remains limited. Most of the authors of imaging publications are not imaging specialists. Imaging specialists among authors in imaging papers are associated with a greater IF.

Key points: • The proportion of imaging specialist authors in non-imaging journals, though small, has increased significantly. • Marked differences are observed according to medical specialties and the reputation/impact factor of the journal. • Collaboration between imaging specialists and non-specialists is associated with publication in higher impact journals.

Keywords: Bibliometrics; Data mining; Diagnostic imaging; Nuclear medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA 307(22):2400–2409 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chew F, Relyea-Chew A (1988) How research becomes knowledge in radiology: an analysis of citations to published papers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(1):31–37 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals - PMC [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2544983/
    1. Yun EJ, Yoon DY, Kim BY et al (2013) Where do radiologists publish their work? A comparative analysis of publications by radiologists in nonradiology journals in 2000 and 2010. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(6):W560–W565 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ku YJ, Yoon DY, Yun EJ, Baek S, Lim KJ, Seo YL et al (2013) An analysis of radiological research publications in high impact general medical journals between 1996 and 2010. Eur J Radiol 82(6):1002–1007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources