Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 1;39(2):59-66.
doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000912.

Imaging of the biliary tract

Affiliations
Review

Imaging of the biliary tract

Pauline Iorio et al. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has become the reference examination for the exploration of the biliary tract and has replaced endoscopic cholangiography for the analysis of the biliary tract because of its equivalent performance and its noninvasive character.

Recent findings: Based on the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) Study Group recommendations for MR imaging in PSC, two protocols can be distinguished for the imaging of biliary tract: a basic protocol and a more complete protocol. It is essential to know the main pitfalls in order not to wrongly describe biliary anomalies. In addition to the excellent performance of MR imaging with MRCP in analyzing the anatomy and the anomalies of the biliary tree, complementary techniques have recently been developed. Several MR prognostic factors have been described. New hepato-specific contrast agents are now available for assessment of the general and segmental liver function. MR Elastography and Diffusion-weighted MR sequences are accurate to evaluate the degree of hepatic fibrosis. Finally, images obtained in MRCP can be postprocessed by a software that will analyze and model the biliary tree in order to quantitatively evaluate the biliary system.

Summary: Magnetic resonance imaging with its recent developments becomes by now an essential tool for the evaluation of biliary diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, et al. MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging 2006; 6:9.
    1. Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith H-J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:514–520.
    1. Vitellas KM, Enns RA, Keogan MT, et al. Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:327–334.
    1. Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2000; 33:520–527.
    1. Aabakken L, Karlsen TH, Albert J, et al. Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49:588–608.