Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):121-128.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001153.

Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era

Mathieu Vandeputte  1 , Thiebault Saveyn  2 , Bart Lutin  2 , Celine De Meyere  1 , Isabelle Parmentier  3 , Mathieu D'Hondt  1
Affiliations

Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era

Mathieu Vandeputte et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. .

Abstract

Background: Thermal ablation is an accepted treatment modality for small and central liver tumors. In extensive colorectal liver metastatic disease (CRLM), hepatectomy can be combined with ablation, resulting in a parenchymal-sparing strategy. This may increase salvageability rates in case of recurrence.

Methods: All patients with advanced CRLM that underwent combined ablation and resection between April 2012 and April 2021, were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoints include postoperative 30-day morbidity and ablation-site recurrence (ASR). The surgical approaches were compared. Ablated lesions were screened for ASR on postoperative follow-up imaging.

Results: Of 54 patients that underwent combined ablation and resection, 32 (59.3%) were performed through a minimally invasive approach. Eleven (20.4%) were minor resections, 32 (59.3%) were technically major and 11 (20.4%) were anatomically major resections. Twelve complications occurred (22.2%), among which 2 (3.8%) major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa). Ninety-day mortality rate was 1.9%. Out of 82 ablated lesions, 6 ASRs (11.1%) occurred. Median blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group, compared with open [90 mL (32.5 to 200) vs. 200 mL (100 to 400), P =0.005]. Pringle maneuver was significantly performed less in the minimally invasive group [8 (25.0%) vs. 16 (72.7%), P =0.001], but took more time [36.1 min (±15.6) vs. 21.6 (±9.9); P =0.011]. Short-term (1 y) overall and disease-free survival were respectively 81.4% and 50.0%.

Conclusion: Combining microwave ablation and liver resection is a feasible and safe parenchymal-sparing technique, through both minimally invasive and open approach for treating extended CRLM disease. It has a low ablation-related complication rate and acceptable ablation-site recurrence rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–1422.
    1. Tinguely P, Dal G, Bottai M, et al. Microwave ablation versus resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases—a propensity score analysis from a population-based nationwide registry. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:476–485.
    1. Weiser M, Jarnagin W, Saltz L. Colorectal cancer patients with oligometastatic liver disease: what is the optimal approach? Oncology (Williston Park). 2013;27:1074–1078.
    1. Hackl C, Neumann P, Gerken M, et al. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases in Germany: a ten-year population-based analysis of 5772 cases of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:810.
    1. Leporrier J, Maurel J, Chiche L, et al. A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:465–474.

MeSH terms