Patient dissatisfaction associated with physician-patient linguistic discordance in California clinics: an analytical cross-sectional study
- PMID: 36823616
- PMCID: PMC9948301
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09176-2
Patient dissatisfaction associated with physician-patient linguistic discordance in California clinics: an analytical cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction is considered as a product of two psychological processes, a cognitive one, including expectations and perceptions, and an emotional one resulting from the congruence between expectation and subjective perception of the user. The objective was to identify the factors associated with the level of perceived satisfaction in patients treated in 36 nonprofit health clinics that offer comprehensive health care services in four counties in the state of California, United States.
Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study in 14 clinics in four California counties. It consisted of the application of a 30-item questionnaire to determine the degree of patient satisfaction with the clinic. The factorial composition of the quality of care and clinic quality components was analyzed and two factors with an Eigen value greater than 1 were obtained.
Results: A total of 846 responses were registered. Factor analysis identified two underlying dimensions: Physician Attitude and Empathy. It was found that the discordance in language between the physician and the patient generates a difference in the perception of satisfaction. Patients who prefer to speak English have better satisfaction than those who speak Spanish. Spanish speakers who do not have interpreter have lower satisfaction than those who do (p < 0,01).
Conclusions: The most important sociodemographic cofactor was language. Satisfaction decreased in Spanish-speaking patients who were not proficient in the use of English since they expressed fewer comments and doubts.
Keywords: Communication barriers; Emigration and immigration; Health services accessibility; Language; Patient satisfaction; Primary health care.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests” in this section.
The managers of the four participating clinics provided the facilities for the evaluation group to have the information available, support staff in the knowledge of community work and within the facilities. They did not participate in the design, data processing or writing of the manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Secretaría de Salud . La calidad de la atención a la salud en México a través de sus instituciones. 2015.
-
- Robledo-Galván H, Meljem-Moctezuma J, Fajardo-Dolci G, et al. De la idea al concepto en la calidad en los servicios de salud. Rev Conamed. 2012;4:17.172–17.175.
-
- Bernal-González I, Pedraza-Melo NA, Lavín-Verástegui J, Monforte-García G. Service quality and users’ satisfaction assessment in the health context in Mexico. Cuad Adm. 2017. 10.25100/cdea.v33i57.4510.
-
- Ng JHY, Luk BHK. Patient satisfaction: concept analysis in the healthcare context. Patient Educ Couns. 2019. 10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.013. - PubMed
-
- Schiffman L, Lazar L. Comportamiento del consumidor. 10. Perentice-Hall Hispanoamericana. S.A; 1997.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
