Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 7:17:1077344.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1077344. eCollection 2023.

Predicting speech-in-noise ability in normal and impaired hearing based on auditory cognitive measures

Affiliations

Predicting speech-in-noise ability in normal and impaired hearing based on auditory cognitive measures

Timothy D Griffiths. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Problems with speech-in-noise (SiN) perception are extremely common in hearing loss. Clinical tests have generally been based on measurement of SiN. My group has developed an approach to SiN based on the auditory cognitive mechanisms that subserve this, that might be relevant to speakers of any language. I describe how well these predict SiN, the brain systems for them, and tests of auditory cognition based on them that might be used to characterise SiN deficits in the clinic.

Keywords: auditory cognition; behaviour; brain; cortex; speech in noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Figure-ground stimulus. The “ground” stimulus contains random elements distributed in frequency-time space. At a certain point in time, shown by the first vertical dashed line, a certain number of elements (four here–shown by arrows) are constrained to remain constant from one time frame to the next. If there are enough elements and they are on for long enough a “figure” emerges perceptually from the background.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation between performance for the figure ground task (SFG, stochastic figure ground) and a widely used US measure of sentence-in-noise perception, AzBio. The data are for 47 cochlear-implant users (see text).

Similar articles

References

    1. Akeroyd M. A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 47 Suppl 2, S53–71. 10.1080/14992020802301142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bays P. M., Husain M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science 321 851–854. 10.1126/science.1158023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Billig A. J., Lad M., Sedley W., Griffiths T. D. (2022). The hearing hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol. 218:102326. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102326 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dryden A., Allen H. A., Henshaw H., Heinrich A. (2017). The association between cognitive performance and speech-in-noise perception for adult listeners: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Trends Hear. 21:2331216517744675. 10.1177/2331216517744675 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Füllgrabe C., Rosen S. (2016). On the (Un)importance of working memory in speech-in-noise processing for listeners with normal hearing thresholds. Front. Psychol. 7:1268. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources