Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 May 1;51(5):563-572.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005806. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

Acute Effects of Ketamine on Intracranial Pressure in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Affiliations
Observational Study

Acute Effects of Ketamine on Intracranial Pressure in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Jennifer C Laws et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: The acute cerebral physiologic effects of ketamine in children have been incompletely described. We assessed the acute effects of ketamine on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design: In this retrospective observational study, patients received bolus doses of ketamine for sedation or as a treatment for ICP crisis (ICP > 20 mm Hg for > 5 min). Administration times were synchronized with ICP and CPP recordings at 1-minute intervals logged in an automated database within the electronic health record. ICP and CPP were each averaged in epochs following drug administration and compared with baseline values. Age-based CPP thresholds were subtracted from CPP recordings and compared with baseline values. Trends in ICP and CPP over time were assessed using generalized least squares regression.

Setting: A 30-bed tertiary care children's hospital PICU.

Patients: Children with severe TBI who underwent ICP monitoring.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We analyzed data from 33 patients, ages 1 month to 16 years, 22 of whom received bolus doses of ketamine, with 127 doses analyzed. Demographics, patient, and injury characteristics were similar between patients who did versus did not receive ketamine boluses. In analysis of the subset of ketamine doses used only for sedation, there was no significant difference in ICP or CPP from baseline. Eighteen ketamine doses were given during ICP crises in 11 patients. ICP decreased following these doses and threshold-subtracted CPP rose.

Conclusions: In this retrospective, exploratory study, ICP did not increase following ketamine administration. In the setting of a guidelines-based protocol, ketamine was associated with a reduction in ICP during ICP crises. If these findings are reproduced in a larger study, ketamine may warrant consideration as a treatment for intracranial hypertension in children with severe TBI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Betters’ institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health (R61HL151951). Dr. Wellons disclosed the off-label product use of ketamine for intracranial pressure. Dr. Slaughter received funding from the Department of Pediatrics for statistical support. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. ICP and CPP before and after non-ICP-targeted ketamine administration.
For each ketamine administration, mean ICP (Figure A) and CPP (Figure B) were calculated for each epoch. Median values for all administrations are shown. Error bars denote interquartile ranges. No values were significantly different from baseline (−5 to −1 minute before ketamine doses) by multiple t tests with the Bonferroni correction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. ICP and CPP before and after ICP-targeted ketamine administration.
ICP-targeted ketamine administrations were identified as those preceded by ICP > 20 mmHg for ≥ 5 minutes. For each ketamine administration, mean ICP and CPP were calculated for each epoch. Figures A and B display restricted cubic splines modeling ICP and CPP, respectively. Dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks denote significant trends over time by generalized least squares analysis ‘NS’ denotes ‘not significant.’ A shows ICP, and B shows the difference between CPP and age-based CPP threshold. Figures C and D show ICP and CPP, respectively, for individual epochs. Median values are displayed. Error bars denote interquartile range. Asterisks denote values significantly different from baseline (−5 to −1 minute before ketamine doses) by multiple t tests with the Bonferroni correction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. ICP Difference between baseline and 5 minutes.
Change in ICP from baseline to 5 minutes after ICP-targeted ketamine doses are displayed in a Tukey box-and-whiskers plot. Data are censored, excluding all measurements taken after any additional ICP-targeted medication. The box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles, with the median denoted by the horizontal line. Error bars denote the minimum and maximum values lying within 1.5 times the interquartile range, and dots represent values lying outside that range. Mean difference is indicated by “+.” The asterisk indicates that the mean is significantly different from zero (p < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Examples of ICP-targeted drug administration.
ICP (mmHg) is displayed in one-minute intervals for two example patients. Medication administrations are denoted by symbols depicted in the keys below each graph. Figure A shows an ICP crisis treated with ketamine and hypertonic saline prior to resolution of intracranial hypertension. ICP rose again 110 minutes following resolution of the initial crisis. Figure B shows a period with prolonged intracranial hypertension in a patient who received multiple ICP-targeted drugs, including ketamine.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dewan MC, Mummareddy N, Wellons JC 3rd, Bonfield CM. Epidemiology of Global Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Qualitative Review. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:497–509.e1. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics: Mortality Data on CDC WONDER. Accessed 2022. Available from: https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd.html.
    1. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, Totten AM, Adelson PD, Selden NR, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(3S Suppl 1):S1–s82. - PubMed
    1. O’Lynnger TM, Shannon CN, Le TM, Greeno A, Chung D, Lamb FS, et al. Standardizing ICU management of pediatric traumatic brain injury is associated with improved outcomes at discharge. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(1):19–26. - PubMed
    1. Shein SL, Ferguson NM, Kochanek PM, Bayir H, Clark RS, Fink EL, et al. Effectiveness of Pharmacological Therapies for Intracranial Hypertension in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury--Results From an Automated Data Collection System Time-Synched to Drug Administration. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(3):236–45. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms