Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 22;10(2):38.
doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020038.

Does Gender Influence the Indication of Treatment and Long-Term Prognosis in Severe Aortic Stenosis?

Affiliations

Does Gender Influence the Indication of Treatment and Long-Term Prognosis in Severe Aortic Stenosis?

Celia Gil Llopis et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is a matter of controversy whether the therapeutic strategy for severe aortic stenosis (AS) differs according to gender.

Methods: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with severe AS (transvalvular mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg and/or aortic valvular area < 1 cm2) between 2009 and 2019. Our aim was to assess the association of sex on AVR or medical management and outcomes in patients with severe AS.

Results: 452 patients were included. Women (51.1%) were older than men (80 ± 8.4 vs. 75.8 ± 9.9 years; p < 0.001). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed less frequently in women (43.4% vs. 53.2%; p = 0.03), but multivariate analyses showed that sex was not an independent predictor factor for AVR. Age, Charlson index and symptoms were predictive factors (OR 0.81 [0.82-0.89], OR 0.81 [0.71-0.93], OR 22.02 [6.77-71.64]). Survival analysis revealed no significant association of sex within all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities (log-rank p = 0.63 and p = 0.07). Cox proportional hazards analyses showed AVR (HR: 0.1 [0.06-0.15]), Charlson index (HR: 1.13 [1.06-1.21]) and reduced LVEF (HR: 1.9 [1.32-2.73]) to be independent cardiovascular mortality predictors.

Conclusions: Gender is not associated with AVR or long-term prognosis. Cardiovascular mortality was associated with older age, more comorbidity and worse LVEF.

Keywords: aortic valve replacement; aortic valve stenosis; mortality; sex differences; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Binary logistic regression model used for multivariate analysis of predictors of AVR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cox regression used for multivariate analysis of predictors of cardiovascular mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to gender.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier cardiovascular survival according to type of AVR.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lung B., Delgado V., Rosenhek R., Price S., Prendergast B., Wendler O., De Bonis M., Tribouilloy C., Evangelista A., Bogachev-Prokophiev A., et al. Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation. 2019;140:1156–1169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shan Y., Pellikka P.A. Aortic stenosis in women. Heart. 2020;106:970–976. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Côté N., Clavel M.-A. Sex Differences in the Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis. Cardiol. Clin. 2019;38:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2019.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saeed S., Dweck M.R., Chambers J. Sex differences in aortic stenosis: From pathophysiology to treatment. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2020;18:65–76. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1732209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eveborn G.W., Schirmer H., Heggelund G., Lunde P., Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø Study. Heart. 2013;99:396–400. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302265. - DOI - PubMed