TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis
- PMID: 36828303
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.009
TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes neuronal activity in the targeted cortex and connected brain regions. The evoked brain response can be measured with electroencephalography (EEG). TMS combined with simultaneous EEG (TMS-EEG) is widely used for studying cortical reactivity and connectivity at high spatiotemporal resolution. Methodologically, the combination of TMS with EEG is challenging, and there are many open questions in the field. Different TMS-EEG equipment and approaches for data collection and analysis are used. The lack of standardization may affect reproducibility and limit the comparability of results produced in different research laboratories. In addition, there is controversy about the extent to which auditory and somatosensory inputs contribute to transcranially evoked EEG. This review provides a guide for researchers who wish to use TMS-EEG to study the reactivity of the human cortex. A worldwide panel of experts working on TMS-EEG covered all aspects that should be considered in TMS-EEG experiments, providing methodological recommendations (when possible) for effective TMS-EEG recordings and analysis. The panel identified and discussed the challenges of the technique, particularly regarding recording procedures, artifact correction, analysis, and interpretation of the transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs). Therefore, this work offers an extensive overview of TMS-EEG methodology and thus may promote standardization of experimental and computational procedures across groups.
Keywords: Artifacts; Electroencephalography; Recommendations; TEPs; TMS−EEG; TMS−EEG data analysis pipelines; TMS−EEG preparation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: PJ has received consulting fees and shares a patent with Nexstim Oyj. PL has received consulting fees from Nexstim Oyj. HRS has received honoraria as speaker from Sanofi Genzyme, Denmark, Lundbeck AS, Denmark, and Novartis, Denmark, as consultant from Sanofi Genzyme, Denmark, Lophora, Denmark, and Lundbeck AS, Denmark, and as editor-in-chief (Neuroimage Clinical) and senior editor (NeuroImage) from Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. He has received royalties as book editor from Springer Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany and from Gyldendal Publishers, Copenhagen, Denmark. TPM has successfully applied for funding for a collaborative research project (project not started at the time of the submission) with Bittium Biosignals Oy (Kuopio, Finland). SC is advisor and share-holder of Intrinsic Power, a spinf-off of the University of Milan.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources