Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 24;14(1):1062.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36776-7.

Molecular imaging of liver inflammation using an anti-VCAM-1 nanobody

Affiliations

Molecular imaging of liver inflammation using an anti-VCAM-1 nanobody

Maxime Nachit et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

To date, a biopsy is mandatory to evaluate parenchymal inflammation in the liver. Here, we evaluated whether molecular imaging of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) could be used as an alternative non-invasive tool to detect liver inflammation in the setting of chronic liver disease. To do so, we radiolabeled anti-VCAM-1 nanobody (99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5) and used single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to quantify liver uptake in preclinical models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with various degree of liver inflammation: wild-type mice fed a normal or high-fat diet (HFD), FOZ fed a HFD and C57BL6/J fed a choline-deficient or -supplemented HFD. 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 uptake strongly correlates with liver histological inflammatory score and with molecular inflammatory markers. The diagnostic power to detect any degree of liver inflammation is excellent (AUROC 0.85-0.99). These data build the rationale to investigate 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 imaging to detect liver inflammation in patients with NAFLD, a largely unmet medical need.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Broisat, C. Ghezzi and N. Devoogdt are inventors on the patent on VCAM-1 Nanobodies (PCT/EP2012/066348), granted amongst other countries in US and Europe (US9771423B2 and EP2748196B8). Other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Specificity of 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 SPECT-CT imaging.
a Body weight (n = 10/group/time point, except V-MCD group (n = 9); two-way ANOVA), b liver weight (n = 10/group, except V-MCD group (n = 9); one-way ANOVA), c plasma ALT activity (STD-fed (n = 10) and MCD-fed (n = 9) mice; unpaired Student’s t-test), d liver MCP-1 mRNA (V-STD (n = 4) and V-MCD (n = 5) group; unpaired Student’s t-test) and e liver VCAM-1 mRNA (V-STD (n = 4) and V-MCD (n = 5) group; unpaired Student’s t-test) in STD-fed mice injected with 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 (V-STD), MCD-fed mice injected with control nanobody (C-MCD) and MCD-fed mice injected with 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 (V-MCD). f Representative SPECT-CT liver imaging with 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 or 99mTc-Control at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks; transversal sections and g SPECT quantification in SUV (C-MCD & V-STD mice (n = 10), and V-MCD mice (n = 9); two-way ANOVA). All data are represented as mean ± SD and significant p values (corrected for multiple testing using Tukey’s post hoc when more than two groups were compared) are given above the bars. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Liver uptake of 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 upon steatohepatitis reversal.
a Representative Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and Oil red-O (ORO) liver staining (x200) in all groups. Liver mRNA expression of b MCP-1, c F4/80, and d VCAM-1 in the three groups of mice (one-way ANOVA, n = 6 for V-STD and n = 5 for V-MCD & V-Reverse groups, corrected for multiple comparisons using Tukey’s post hoc). e Representative SPECT-CT liver imaging with 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 at 1 and 4 weeks, transversal sections. f SPECT quantification in SUV (two-way ANOVA, n = 9 for V-STD & V-MCD mice and n = 8 for V-Reverse, corrected for multiple comparisons using Šídák’s test). All data are represented as mean ± SD and significant p values are given above the bars. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Characteristics of the NAFLD models.
a Body weight, b liver weight, and histological c steatosis score, d inflammatory score, e ballooning score, and f total NAS score in WT mice fed a normal diet (Ctl, n = 8) or a high fat diet (WH, n = 6), in FOZ mice fed a high fat diet (FH, n = 6) and in C57BL6/J mice fed a fat-rich choline supplemented (CSH, n = 6) or deficient (CDH, n = 6) diet (one-way ANOVA and Welch’s t-test). g Representative liver histology in all groups (thick arrow = inflammatory loci, thin arrow = ballooning). All data are represented as mean ± SD and significant p values (corrected for multiple testing using Tukey’s post-hoc when more than 2 groups were compared) are given above the bars. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. VCAM1 expression correlates with inflammatory markers.
a F4/80, b MCP-1, and c VCAM-1 mRNA fold change (one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, n = 7 for Ctl and n = 6 for other groups). Spearman’s correlations between VCAM-1 mRNA level (fold change compared to housekeeping gene RPL19) and d F4/80 fold change, e histological inflammatory score, and f CLS, respectively. g VCAM-1 protein content per mg of tissue (one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, n = 8 for Ctl and n = 6 for other groups). h Total ng of VCAM-1 in the liver (one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, n = 8 for Ctl and n = 6 for other groups). All data are represented as mean ± SD and significant p values (corrected for multiple testing using Tukey’s post-hoc when more than 2 groups were compared) are given above the bars. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 liver uptake correlates with VCAM-1 expression.
SUV Liver measured in all groups a in vivo by SPECT or b ex vivo (one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, n = 8 for Ctl and n = 6 for other groups). c Representative SPECT transversal images. SUVLean Liver d in vivo and e ex vivo, and total liver uptake (%ID) f in vivo and g ex vivo of 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 evaluated with SPECT (one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test, n = 8 for Ctl and n = 6 for other groups). All data are represented as mean ± SD and significant p values (corrected for multiple testing using Tukey’s post-hoc when more than 2 groups were compared) are given above the bars. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. 99mTc-cAbVCAM1-5 uptake robustly reflects on liver inflammation in a fatty liver.
ROC curves for detection of liver inflammation a in the entire cohort (Normal + NAFLD) using SUVLeanLiverin-vivo values, or b using %ID Liverin-vivo values, and c only in animals with liver steatosis (NAFLD only) using SUVLeanLiverin-vivo values, or d using %ID Liverin-vivo values. AUC: area under the curve calculated using Wilson/Brown method, 95% confidence interval (CI) and p values are provided on each panel. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;18:2650–2666. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanyal AJ. Past, present and future perspectives in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:377–386. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0144-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koyama Y, Brenner DA. Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:55–64. doi: 10.1172/JCI88881. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khalifa A, Rockey DC. The utility of liver biopsy in 2020. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2020;36:184–191. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000621. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skripenova S, Trainer TD, Krawitt EL, Blaszyk H. Variability of grade and stage in simultaneous paired liver biopsies in patients with hepatitis C. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007;60:321–324. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.036020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances