Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 6;10(2):210.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020210.

Rehabilitation Practitioners' Perceptions of Optimal Sitting and Standing Posture in Men with Normal Weight and Obesity

Jiling Ye  1 , Ziang Jiang  2 , Shijie Chen  3 , Rongshan Cheng  2 , Lili Xu  1 , Tsung-Yuan Tsai  2
Affiliations

Rehabilitation Practitioners' Perceptions of Optimal Sitting and Standing Posture in Men with Normal Weight and Obesity

Jiling Ye et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

The concepts of "optimal posture (OP)" and "harmful posture (HP)" are commonly used, and specific spinal postures can contribute to back pain. However, quantitative descriptions of optimal and harmful standing (StP) and sitting (SP) postures are currently lacking, particularly for different body mass indices (BMIs). Therefore, this study aimed to identify and quantify the OPs and HPs of StP and SP at different BMIs and investigate the attitudes and beliefs of rehabilitation practitioners toward OPs and HPs. Overall, 552 rehabilitation practitioners were recruited to participate in a questionnaire survey to select the optimal position from seven sitting and five standing postures for each BMI healthy volunteer. The segmental relationships of each posture were qualified using the Vicon software. For normal BMI, the physiotherapists chose two SPs (48.19% and 49.64%) and one StP (80.42%) as the OP. One sitting SP (83.7%) and two standing StPs (43.48% and 48.19%) were selected as optimal for obese BMI. All the most commonly selected OPs had an upright lordotic posture, while the postures with slouched spinal curves or forward head postures were almost all selected as HP. Additionally, 96.74% of participants considered education about optimal SP and StP to be "quite" or "very" important. The OP of the StP and SP postures was mostly based on the vertical alignment of gravity lines and sagittal balance. For obese people, the rehabilitation practitioners' observations may be erroneous, and further physical examination is necessary. Rehabilitation practitioners generally believe that postural education is essential in clinical practice.

Keywords: BMI; back pain; postural health; rehabilitation practitioners; sitting; standing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sitting and standing postures of the first healthy volunteer with a BMI of 21 kg/m2: (a) the five determined standing postures; (b) the seven determined sitting postures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sitting and standing postures of the second healthy volunteer with a BMI of 32 kg/m2: (a) the five determined standing postures; (b) the seven determined sitting postures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The eight sagittal angles calculated in the study describe the spinal configuration of each seated and standing posture. Abbreviations: CLMO, center of lateral margins of the orbit; CASIS, center of the anterior superior iliac spine; CPSIS, center of the posterior superior iliac spine; MPFE, main protuberance of the forehead between the eyebrows.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. AAOS . Posture and Its Relationship to Orthopaedic Disabilities. A Report of the Posture Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. AAOS; Rosemont, IL, USA: 1947.
    1. Woodhull A.M., Maltrud K., Mello B.L. Alignment of the human body in standing. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1985;54:109–115. doi: 10.1007/BF00426309. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kendall F.P., Mccreary E.K., Provance P.G., Rodgers M.I., Romani W.A. Muscles. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2013. Testing and Function, with Posture and Pain.
    1. Harrison D.D., Harrison S.O., Croft A.C., Harrison D.E., Troyanovich S.J. Sitting biomechanics part I: Review of the literature. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 1999;22:594–609. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(99)70020-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuchera M. Gravitational stress, musculoligamentous strain, and postural alignment. Spine State Art Rev. 1995;9:463–489.