Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 18;12(2):197.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020197.

Practice Patterns in Fournier's Gangrene in Europe and Implications for a Prospective Registry Study

Laila Schneidewind  1 , Bernhard Kiss  2 , Fabian P Stangl  2 , Zafer Tandogdu  3 , Florian M E Wagenlehner  4 , Truls E Bjerklund Johansen  5 , Béla Köves  6 , Jose Medina-Polo  7 , Ana Maria Tapia  8 , Jennifer Kranz  9   10
Affiliations

Practice Patterns in Fournier's Gangrene in Europe and Implications for a Prospective Registry Study

Laila Schneidewind et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening, necrotizing infection. Due to the rareness of the disease, it is challenging to plan robust prospective studies. This study aims to describe current practice patterns of FG in Europe and identify implications for planning a prospective FG registry.

Methods: Online non-validated 17-items survey among urologists treating FG in in European hospitals. Questionnaires were analyzed with LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH Hamburg, Germany).

Results: 229 responses from ten different European countries were submitted, and 117 (51.1%) urologists completed the questionnaire. The departments treat a mean of 4.2 (SD 3.11) patients per year. The urology department mostly takes the lead in treating FG patients (n = 113; 96.6%). The practice in FG is very heterogenic and mostly case-based all over Europe, e.g., vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC) is mostly used (n = 50; 42.7%) as adjunct wound. The biggest challenges in FG are the short time to diagnosis and treatment, standardization and establishment of guidelines, and disease awareness. Additionally, participants stated that an international registry is an outstanding initiative, and predictive models are needed.

Conclusions: There is no standard of care in the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term care of FG all over Europe. Further research could be conducted with a prospective registry.

Keywords: Fournier’s gangrene; antibiotic stewardship; necrotizing fasciitis; outcome parameters; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percental participation from ten different European countries.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Osburn N., Hapson L.A., Holt S.K., Gore J.L., Wessells H., Voelzke B.B. Low-volume versus High-volume centers and management of Founier’s Gangrene in Washington State. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2017;224:270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yilmazlar T., Gulcu B., Isik O., Oztruk E. Microbiological aspects of Fournier’s gangrene. Int. J. Surg. 2017;40:135–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kranz J., Schlager D., Anheuser P., Mühlstädt S., Brücher B., Frank T., Barski D., Mayr R., Lunacek A., Macharia-Nimietz E.F., et al. Desperate need for better management in Fournier’s gangrene. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 2018;71:360–365. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Furr J., Watts T., Street R., Cross B., Slobodov G., Patel S. Contemporary trends in the inpatient management of Fournier’s gangrene: Predictors of length of stay and mortality based on population-based sample. Urology. 2017;102:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjurlin M.A., O’Grady T., Kim D.Y., Divakaruni N., Drago A., Blumetti J., Hollowell C.M.P. Causative pathogens, antibiotic sensitivity, resistance patterns, and severity in a contemporary series of Fournier’s gangrene. Urology. 2013;4:752–758. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.041. - DOI - PubMed