Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 10;13(4):623.
doi: 10.3390/ani13040623.

Genetic Diversity and Trends of Ancestral and New Inbreeding in German Sheep Breeds by Pedigree Data

Affiliations

Genetic Diversity and Trends of Ancestral and New Inbreeding in German Sheep Breeds by Pedigree Data

Cathrin Justinski et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

In Germany, many autochthonous sheep breeds have developed, adapted to mountain, heath, moorland, or other marginal sites, but breeds imported from other countries have also contributed to the domestic breeds, particularly improving wool and meat quality. Selective breeding and the intense use of rams may risk losing genetic diversity and increasing rates of inbreeding. On the other hand, breeds with a low number of founder animals and only regional popularity may not leave their endangered status, as the number of breeders interested in the breed is limited. The objective of the present study was to determine demographic measures of genetic diversity and recent as well as ancestral trends of inbreeding in all autochthonous German sheep breeds and sheep of all breeding directions, including wool, meat, and milk. We used pedigree data from 1,435,562 sheep of 35 different breeds and a reference population of 981,093 sheep, born from 2010 to 2020. The mean number of equivalent generations, founders, effective founders, effective ancestors, and effective founder genomes were 5.77, 1669, 123.2, 63.5, and 33.0, respectively. Genetic drift accounted for 69% of the loss of genetic diversity, while loss due to unequal founder contributions was 31%. The mean inbreeding coefficient, individual rate of inbreeding (∆Fi), and realized effective population size across breeds were 0.031, 0.0074, and 91.4, respectively, with a significantly decreasing trend in ∆Fi in 11/35 breeds. New inbreeding, according to Kalinowski, contributed to 71.8% of individual inbreeding, but ancestral inbreeding coefficients showed an increasing trend in all breeds. In conclusion, in our study, all but one of the mountain-stone sheep breeds and the country sheep breed Wald were the most vulnerable populations, with Ne < 50. The next most endangered breeds are exotic, country, and heath breeds, with average Ne of 66, 83, and 89, respectively. The wool, meat, and milk breeds showed the highest genetic diversity, with average Ne of 158, 120, and 111, respectively. The results of our study should help strengthen conservation program efforts for the most endangered sheep breeds and maintain a high genetic diversity in all sheep breeds.

Keywords: German sheep breeds; ancestral inbreeding; genetic diversity; inbreeding; pedigree analysis; realized effective population size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest and there are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of genealogical estimators of genetic diversity for 35 sheep breeds in Germany with (A) effective number of founders (fe), (B) effective number of founder genomes (fg), (C) effective number of ancestors (fa) and their ratios, and (DF) representing possible bottlenecks in the population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Loss of genetic diversity from unequal contributions of founders and genetic drift.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual rate of inbreeding (ΔFi) and realized effective population size (Ne) in 35 sheep breeds.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Inbreeding coefficients of Kalinowski ancestral (Fa_Kal) and new (FNew) in 35 sheep breeds.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ancestral inbreeding coefficients in 35 sheep breeds, according to Ballou (Fa_Bal) and Baumung (AHC).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Number of dams (No_dams) and effective number of dams (Effective_dams) as birth year averages for 35 sheep breeds.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Number of sires (No_sires) and effective number of sires (Effective_sires) as birth year averages for 35 sheep breeds.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peter C. Molekulargenetische Charakterisierung von Schafrassen Europas und des Nahen Ostens auf der Basis von Mikrosatelliten. VVB Laufersweiler; Gießen, Germany: 2006.
    1. Rochus C.M., Johansson A.M. Estimation of genetic diversity in Gute sheep: Pedigree and microsatellite analyses of an ancient Swedish breed. Hereditas. 2017;154:4. doi: 10.1186/s41065-017-0026-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawson Handley L., Byrne K., Santucci F., Townsend S., Taylor M., Bruford M.W., Hewitt G. Genetic structure of European sheep breeds. Heredity. 2007;99:620–631. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galal S., Boyazoglu J. Animal Genetic Resources Information. Publishing and Multimedia Service, Information Division, FAO; Rome, Italy: 1997.
    1. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995;29:305–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001513. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources